These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26743256)
1. IMPLICATIONS OF PATIENT CENTRING ON ORGAN DOSE IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Kataria B; Sandborg M; Althén JN Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):130-5. PubMed ID: 26743256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. INFLUENCE OF LOCALIZER AND SCAN DIRECTION ON THE DOSE-REDUCING EFFECT OF AUTOMATIC TUBE CURRENT MODULATION IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Franck C; Bacher K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):136-42. PubMed ID: 27056145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study. Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vertical off-centering affects organ dose in chest CT: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations in anthropomorphic phantoms. Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5697-5704. PubMed ID: 28817195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction? Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. OVERVIEW, PRACTICAL TIPS AND POTENTIAL PITFALLS OF USING AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL IN CT: SIEMENS CARE DOSE 4D. Söderberg M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):84-91. PubMed ID: 26567324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adult abdomen-pelvis CT: Does equilibrium dose-pitch product better account for the kVp dependence of organ dose than conventional CTDI? Li X; Morgan AG; Liptak CL; Muryn JS; Dong FF; Primak AN; Segars WP Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6258-68. PubMed ID: 26520718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Precise and Automatic Patient Positioning in Computed Tomography: Avatar Modeling of the Patient Surface Using a 3-Dimensional Camera. Saltybaeva N; Schmidt B; Wimmer A; Flohr T; Alkadhi H Invest Radiol; 2018 Nov; 53(11):641-646. PubMed ID: 29762259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality. Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. COMPARISON OF ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION (ASIR™) AND MODEL-BASED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION (VEO™) FOR PAEDIATRIC ABDOMINAL CT EXAMINATIONS: AN OBSERVER PERFORMANCE STUDY OF DIAGNOSTIC IMAGE QUALITY. Hultenmo M; Caisander H; Mack K; Thilander-Klang A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):107-14. PubMed ID: 26873711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abdominal CT during pregnancy: a phantom study on the effect of patient centring on conceptus radiation dose and image quality. Solomou G; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):911-21. PubMed ID: 25430006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans. Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic exposure control systems designed to maintain constant image noise: effects on computed tomography dose and noise relative to clinically accepted technique charts. Favazza CP; Yu L; Leng S; Kofler JM; McCollough CH J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 25938214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of vertical positioning on organ dose, image noise and contrast in pediatric chest CT--phantom study. Kaasalainen T; Palmu K; Lampinen A; Kortesniemi M Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Jun; 43(6):673-84. PubMed ID: 23341090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms. Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of dose conversion coefficients for an eight-year-old Iranian male phantom undergoing computed tomography. Akhlaghi P; Hakimabad HM; Motavalli LR Radiat Environ Biophys; 2015 Nov; 54(4):465-74. PubMed ID: 26082027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of mA Reduction on Image Quality Parameters and Patient Dose in Computed Tomography Imaging. Saeed RS; Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah KH; Al Enezi OJ Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 26721839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal use of AEC in CT: a literature review. Gudjónsdóttir J; Ween B; Olsen DR Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 20207787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How patient off-centering impacts organ dose and image noise in pediatric head and thoracoabdominal CT. Euler A; Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6790-6793. PubMed ID: 31278575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Point Organ Radiation Dose in Abdominal CT: Effect of Patient Off-Centering in an Experimental Human Cadaver Study. Ali Khawaja RD; Singh S; Padole A; Otrakji A; Lira D; Zhang D; Liu B; Primak A; Xu G; Kalra MK Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Aug; 175(4):440-449. PubMed ID: 28074019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]