223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26743390)
21. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence.
DiMarco DS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2003 Oct; 170(4 Pt 1):1252-4. PubMed ID: 14501735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does indigo carmine prevent early artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion?
Petrou SP; Thiel DD; Elliot DS; Broderick GA; Wehle MJ; Young PR
Can J Urol; 2006 Aug; 13(4):3195-8. PubMed ID: 16952328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Review of single-surgeon 10-year experience with artificial urinary sphincter with report of sterile cuff erosion managed nonsurgically.
Singla N; Singla AK
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):252-6. PubMed ID: 25530393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence.
Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF
J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Long-term device outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation following prior explantation for erosion or infection.
Linder BJ; de Cogain M; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2014 Mar; 191(3):734-8. PubMed ID: 24018241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff on primary and revision surgery for male stress urinary incontinence.
Hudak SJ; Morey AF
J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1962-6. PubMed ID: 21944140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Male Patients with Spina Bifida: Comparison of Perioperative and Functional Outcomes between Bulbar Urethra and Bladder Neck Cuff Placement.
Khene ZE; Paret F; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Prudhomme T; Hascoet J; Nedelec M; Kerdraon J; Menard H; Jezequel M; Le Normand L; Manunta A; Game X; Peyronnet B
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):791-797. PubMed ID: 29037862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Complications and Short-Term Explantation Rate Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation: Results from a Large Middle European Multi-Institutional Case Series.
Kretschmer A; Hüsch T; Thomsen F; Kronlachner D; Obaje A; Anding R; Pottek T; Rose A; Olianas R; Friedl A; Hübner W; Homberg R; Pfitzenmaier J; Grein U; Queissert F; Naumann CM; Schweiger J; Wotzka C; Nyarangi-Dix JN; Hofmann T; Seiler R; Haferkamp A; Bauer RM;
Urol Int; 2016; 97(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 27310718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter.
Raj GV; Peterson AC; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 15758761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Immediate Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) Reactivation at the Time of Urethral Cuff Exchange is Not Associated with Increased Erosion Rate.
Rabinowitz MJ; Haney NM; Liu JL; Dani H; Cohen AJ; Wright EJ
Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():253-256. PubMed ID: 34343563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is Removal of the Pressure-regulating Balloon Necessary After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion?
Rozanski AT; Viers BR; Shakir NA; Pagliara TJ; Scott JM; Morey AF
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():225-229. PubMed ID: 29155193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Complications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in patients with or without prior radiotherapy.
Ravier E; Fassi-Fehri H; Crouzet S; Gelet A; Abid N; Martin X
BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 24731208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Indications for revision of artificial urinary sphincter and modifiable risk factors for device-related morbidity.
Anusionwu II; Wright EJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Jan; 32(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 22693077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intraurethral catheter placement does not change the external circumferential measurement of the urethra during AUS placement: A prospective observational trial.
Boysen WR; Inouye BM; Kowalik U; Madden-Fuentes RJ; Kahokehr AA; Peterson AC
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jun; 39(5):1538-1542. PubMed ID: 32449543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dorsolateral fibromuscular tissue preservation during artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with low infection and erosion rates.
Cheung F; Fathollahi A; Vertosick E; Jarvis TR; Katz D; Sandhu JS
BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):328-334. PubMed ID: 29972627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transcorporal vs. bulbar artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients with fragile urethra.
El-Akri M; Bentellis I; Tricard T; Brierre T; Cousin T; Dupuis H; Hermieu N; Gaillard V; Poussot B; Robin D; Pitout A; Beraud F; Bertrand-Leon P; Chevallier D; Bruyere F; Biardeau X; Monsaint H; Corbel L; Saussine C; Hermieu JF; Lecoanet P; Capon G; Cornu JN; Game X; Ruffion A; Peyronnet B
World J Urol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):4449-4457. PubMed ID: 34272596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Revision Techniques After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure in Men: Results From a Multicenter Study.
Eswara JR; Chan R; Vetter JM; Lai HH; Boone TB; Brandes SB
Urology; 2015 Jul; 86(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 26142602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Permanent urethral ligation after AUS cuff erosion: Is it ready for prime time?
Van Dyke M; Ortiz N; Baumgarten A; Ward E; Baker R; Hudak S; Morey A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Jan; 40(1):211-218. PubMed ID: 33034933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
