417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26744108)
21. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer.
O'Malley DM; Smith B; Fowler JM
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):761-8. PubMed ID: 26385835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications.
Marino P; Houvenaeghel G; Narducci F; Boyer-Chammard A; Ferron G; Uzan C; Bats AS; Mathevet P; Dessogne P; Guyon F; Rouanet P; Jaffre I; Carcopino X; Perez T; Lambaudie E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1102-8. PubMed ID: 26098092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese).
Dinoi G; Tarantino V; Bizzarri N; Perrone E; Capasso I; Giannarelli D; Querleu D; Giuliano MC; Fagotti A; Scambia G; Fanfani F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 May; 34(5):773-776. PubMed ID: 38326228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Post robotic investment: Cost consequences and impact on length of stay for obese women with endometrial cancer.
Korsholm M; Gyrd-Hansen D; Mogensen O; Möller S; Joergensen SL; Jensen PT
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Oct; 100(10):1830-1839. PubMed ID: 34322867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vaginal vs. robotic hysterectomy for patients with endometrial cancer: A comparison of outcomes and cost of care.
Nitschmann CC; Multinu F; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Langstraat CL; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; Cliby WA; Mariani A; Dowdy SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jun; 145(3):555-561. PubMed ID: 28392125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?
Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Complications of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in the Severely Morbidly Obese.
Cosin JA; Brett Sutherland MA; Westgate CT; Fang H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Nov; 23(12):4035-4041. PubMed ID: 27334223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.
Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients.
Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00001. PubMed ID: 25848196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
