180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26744231)
1. Comparison of different clinical development plans for confirmatory subpopulation selection.
Rufibach K; Chen M; Nguyen H
Contemp Clin Trials; 2016 Mar; 47():78-84. PubMed ID: 26744231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.
Jenkins M; Stone A; Jennison C
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 22328327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Group-sequential methods for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials.
Stallard N
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):787-801. PubMed ID: 21516569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials.
Bretz F; Koenig F; Brannath W; Glimm E; Posch M
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(8):1181-217. PubMed ID: 19206095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A varying-stage adaptive phase II/III clinical trial design.
Dong G
Stat Med; 2014 Apr; 33(8):1272-87. PubMed ID: 24273128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 2-in-1 adaptive phase 2/3 design for expedited oncology drug development.
Chen C; Anderson K; Mehrotra DV; Rubin EH; Tse A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2018 Jan; 64():238-242. PubMed ID: 28966137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptive seamless designs with interim treatment selection: a case study in oncology.
Carreras M; Gutjahr G; Brannath W
Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(8):1317-33. PubMed ID: 25640198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptive designs at European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) with a focus on adaptive sample size re-estimation based on interim-effect size.
Mauer M; Collette L; Bogaerts J;
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Jun; 48(9):1386-91. PubMed ID: 22281098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomarker-based Bayesian randomized phase II clinical trial design to identify a sensitive patient subpopulation.
Morita S; Yamamoto H; Sugitani Y
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4008-16. PubMed ID: 24820639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomarker-Guided Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.
Antoniou M; Jorgensen AL; Kolamunnage-Dona R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149803. PubMed ID: 26910238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomarker driven population enrichment for adaptive oncology trials with time to event endpoints.
Mehta C; Schäfer H; Daniel H; Irle S
Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(26):4515-31. PubMed ID: 25130879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sequential design of phase II-III cancer trials.
Lai TL; Lavori PW; Shih MC
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(18):1944-60. PubMed ID: 22422502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptive clinical trials for new drug applications in Japan.
Ando Y; Hirakawa A; Uyama Y
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2011 Feb; 21(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 20961739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical characteristics of adaptive design in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.
Sato A; Shimura M; Gosho M
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2018 Apr; 43(2):170-180. PubMed ID: 28850685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The design of phase II clinical trials testing cancer therapeutics: consensus recommendations from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee.
Seymour L; Ivy SP; Sargent D; Spriggs D; Baker L; Rubinstein L; Ratain MJ; Le Blanc M; Stewart D; Crowley J; Groshen S; Humphrey JS; West P; Berry D
Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Mar; 16(6):1764-9. PubMed ID: 20215557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology.
Brannath W; Zuber E; Branson M; Bretz F; Gallo P; Posch M; Racine-Poon A
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1445-63. PubMed ID: 19266565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interim futility analysis with intermediate endpoints.
Goldman B; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 18283075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sequential designs for phase III clinical trials incorporating treatment selection.
Stallard N; Todd S
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):689-703. PubMed ID: 12587100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
