These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26745347)

  • 1. Residential Solar PV Systems in the Carolinas: Opportunities and Outcomes.
    Alqahtani BJ; Holt KM; Patiño-Echeverri D; Pratson L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(4):2082-91. PubMed ID: 26745347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costs of solar and wind power variability for reducing CO2 emissions.
    Lueken C; Cohen GE; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9761-7. PubMed ID: 22877159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can hybrid solar-fossil power plants mitigate CO2 at lower cost than PV or CSP?
    Moore J; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2487-93. PubMed ID: 23379665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life cycle cost analysis of solar energy via environmental externality monetization.
    Huang B; Wang Y; Huang Y; Xu X; Chen X; Duan L; Yu G; Li Z; Liu H; Kua HW; Xue B
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 856(Pt 1):158910. PubMed ID: 36152852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the economic and environmental feasibility of utility scaled PV electricity production in the state of Georgia.
    Taylor R; Critttenden J
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2012 Jan; 54(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 23741866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Switch: a planning tool for power systems with large shares of intermittent renewable energy.
    Fripp M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):6371-8. PubMed ID: 22506835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Cooling Systems for Coal- and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants with and without Carbon Capture and Storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(7):4127-34. PubMed ID: 26967583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
    Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opportunity for offshore wind to reduce future demand for coal-fired power plants in China with consequent savings in emissions of CO2.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Chen X; Kang C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14764-71. PubMed ID: 25409413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Near-term implications of a ban on new coal-fired power plants in the United States.
    Newcomer A; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(11):3995-4001. PubMed ID: 19569321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hydro, wind and solar power as a base for a 100% renewable energy supply for South and Central America.
    Barbosa LS; Bogdanov D; Vainikka P; Breyer C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173820. PubMed ID: 28329023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tradeoffs and Synergies between biofuel production and large solar infrastructure in deserts.
    Ravi S; Lobell DB; Field CB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(5):3021-30. PubMed ID: 24467248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of carbon footprint effect of renewable power plants regarding energy production: A case study of a city in Turkey.
    Kerem A
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Mar; 72(3):294-307. PubMed ID: 35030055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Energy consumption and energy-saving potential analysis of pollutant abatement systems in a 1000-MW coal-fired power plant.
    Yang H; Zhang Y; Zheng C; Wu X; Chen L; Gao X; Fu JS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Sep; 68(9):920-930. PubMed ID: 29746799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
    Whittington HW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.