These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26745598)

  • 1. ANCOVA Versus CHANGE From Baseline in Nonrandomized Studies: The Difference.
    van Breukelen GJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2013 Nov; 48(6):895-922. PubMed ID: 26745598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-centered ANCOVA: Resolving contradictory results from Lord's paradox with implications for reducing bias in longitudinal analyses.
    Lin H; Larzelere RE
    J Adolesc; 2020 Dec; 85():135-147. PubMed ID: 33242670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with difference scores.
    Jamieson J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 May; 52(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15094250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does Exercise Improve Cognitive Performance? A Conservative Message from Lord's Paradox.
    Liu S; Lebeau JC; Tenenbaum G
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1092. PubMed ID: 27493637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected].
    Van Breukelen GJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 59(9):920-5. PubMed ID: 16895814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some unexamined aspects of analysis of covariance in pretest-posttest studies.
    Ganju J
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):829-33. PubMed ID: 15339308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias for Treatment Effect by Measurement Error in Pretest in ANCOVA Analysis.
    Miyazaki Y; Kamata A; Uekawa K; Sun Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Dec; 82(6):1130-1152. PubMed ID: 36325124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lord's paradox in a continuous setting and a regression artifact in numerical cognition research.
    Eriksson K; Häggström O
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95949. PubMed ID: 24752244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A structural equation modelling approach to the analysis of change.
    Tu YK; Baelum V; Gilthorpe MS
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Aug; 116(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 18705795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008).
    Nickerson CA; Brown NJL
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2019; 16():5. PubMed ID: 31788009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nutrition intervention group program based on preaction-stage-oriented change processes of the Transtheoretical Model promotes long-term reduction in dietary fat intake.
    Finckenor M; Byrd-Bredbenner C
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Mar; 100(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 10719408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical issues on the analysis of change in follow-up studies in dental research.
    Blance A; Tu YK; Baelum V; Gilthorpe MS
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 35(6):412-20. PubMed ID: 18039282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fallible covariates.
    Culpepper SA; Aguinis H
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 21517178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytic methods for questions pertaining to a randomized pretest, posttest, follow-up design.
    Rausch JR; Maxwell SE; Kelley K
    J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol; 2003 Sep; 32(3):467-86. PubMed ID: 12881035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allocation to groups: Examples of Lord's paradox.
    Wright DB
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2020 Jun; 90 Suppl 1():35-49. PubMed ID: 31301075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiplicative treatment effects in randomized pretest-posttest experimental designs.
    Liu Q; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 31192625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results.
    Wright DB
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2006 Sep; 76(Pt 3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16953968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change from baseline and analysis of covariance revisited.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4334-44. PubMed ID: 16921578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response to: Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008) by Nickerson CA & Brown NJL (https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-2).
    Gilthorpe MS; Tu YK
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2020; 17():1. PubMed ID: 32190094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical power for nonequivalent pretest-posttest designs. The impact of change-score versus ANCOVA models.
    Oakes JM; Feldman HA
    Eval Rev; 2001 Feb; 25(1):3-28. PubMed ID: 11205523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.