These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26745896)

  • 1. Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms.
    Erickson DW; Wells JR; Sturgeon GM; Samei E; Dobbins JT; Segars WP; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):23. PubMed ID: 26745896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generation of a suite of 3D computer-generated breast phantoms from a limited set of human subject data.
    Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):043703. PubMed ID: 23556929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
    Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of realistic physical breast phantoms matched to virtual breast phantoms based on human subject data.
    Kiarashi N; Nolte AC; Sturgeon GM; Segars WP; Ghate SV; Nolte LW; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4116-26. PubMed ID: 26133612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.
    Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advances in digital and physical anthropomorphic breast phantoms for x-ray imaging.
    Glick SJ; Ikejimba LC
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):e870-e885. PubMed ID: 30058117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2022 May; 97():50-58. PubMed ID: 35395535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant-geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms.
    Hernandez AM; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 28715130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. X-ray scatter correction method for dedicated breast computed tomography.
    Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2896-903. PubMed ID: 22559662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images.
    Pike R; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6190-202. PubMed ID: 26520712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-based 4D digital breast phantom for perfusion contrast-enhanced breast CT imaging.
    Caballo M; Mann R; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4448-4460. PubMed ID: 30151857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo evaluation of glandular dose in cone-beam X-ray computed tomography dedicated to the breast: Homogeneous and heterogeneous breast models.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Tucciariello RM; Bliznakova K; Boone JM; Sechopoulos I; Di Lillo F; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():99-107. PubMed ID: 29885958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cupping artifact correction and automated classification for high-resolution dedicated breast CT images.
    Yang X; Wu S; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6397-406. PubMed ID: 23039675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metallic artifact mitigation and organ-constrained tissue assignment for Monte Carlo calculations of permanent implant lung brachytherapy.
    Sutherland JG; Miksys N; Furutani KM; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011712. PubMed ID: 24387504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generation of voxelized breast phantoms from surgical mastectomy specimens.
    O'Connor JM; Das M; Dider CS; Mahd M; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041915. PubMed ID: 23556909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom.
    Lau BA; Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Bakic PR
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3375-85. PubMed ID: 22755718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms.
    Ivanov D; Bliznakova K; Buliev I; Popov P; Mettivier G; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Sarno A; Vignero J; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Bliznakov Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(17):175020. PubMed ID: 29999497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cardiac motion correction based on partial angle reconstructed images in x-ray CT.
    Kim S; Chang Y; Ra JB
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2560-71. PubMed ID: 25979048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.