These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26745896)

  • 21. A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.
    Hoeschen C; Fill U; Zankl M; Panzer W; Regulla D; Döhring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):406-9. PubMed ID: 15933147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A quantitative metrology for performance characterization of five breast tomosynthesis systems based on an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Ikejimba L; Lo JY; Chen Y; Oberhofer N; Kiarashi N; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1627. PubMed ID: 27036562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation.
    Sturgeon GM; Kiarashi N; Lo JY; Samei E; Segars WP
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2207. PubMed ID: 27147333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modeling Lung Architecture in the XCAT Series of Phantoms: Physiologically Based Airways, Arteries and Veins.
    Abadi E; Segars WP; Sturgeon GM; Roos JE; Ravin CE; Samei E
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Mar; 37(3):693-702. PubMed ID: 29533891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.
    Li CM; Segars WP; Tourassi GD; Boone JM; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3122-31. PubMed ID: 19673211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An analysis of the mechanical parameters used for finite element compression of a high-resolution 3D breast phantom.
    Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5756-70. PubMed ID: 21992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The advent of anthropomorphic three-dimensional breast phantoms for X-ray imaging.
    Bliznakova K
    Phys Med; 2020 Nov; 79():145-161. PubMed ID: 33321469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.
    Bliznakova K; Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Pallikarakis N
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5604-17. PubMed ID: 21158272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Twenty new digital brain phantoms for creation of validation image data bases.
    Aubert-Broche B; Griffin M; Pike GB; Evans AC; Collins DL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Nov; 25(11):1410-6. PubMed ID: 17117770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Photon counting spectral breast CT: effect of adaptive filtration on CT numbers, noise, and contrast to noise ratio.
    Silkwood JD; Matthews KL; Shikhaliev PM
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051905. PubMed ID: 23635275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new mammography dosimetric phantom.
    Almeida CD; Coutinho CM; Dantas BM; Peixoto JE; Koch HA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 22223722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Synthetic breast phantoms from patient based eigenbreasts.
    Sturgeon GM; Park S; Segars WP; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6270-6279. PubMed ID: 28905385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simulated scatter performance of an inverse-geometry dedicated breast CT system.
    Bhagtani R; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 19378739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations for virtual clinical trials in breast X-ray imaging: Proof of concept.
    di Franco F; Sarno A; Mettivier G; Hernandez AM; Bliznakova K; Boone JM; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2020 Jun; 74():133-142. PubMed ID: 32470909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigation of the refractive index decrement of 3D printing materials for manufacturing breast phantoms for phase contrast imaging.
    Esposito G; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Buliev I; Di Lillo F; Ivanov D; Minutillo M; Sarno A; Vignero J; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(7):075008. PubMed ID: 30754030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
    Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of shaped filter design on dose and image quality in breast CT.
    Lück F; Kolditz D; Hupfer M; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4205-23. PubMed ID: 23715466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.