These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26746850)

  • 1. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.
    Lapuente-Ocamica O; Ugarte L; Lopez-Picado A; Sanchez-Refoyo F; Lasa IL; Echevarria O; Álvarez-Sala J; Fariñas A; Bilbao I; Barbero L; Vicarregui J; Hernanz Chaves R; Paz Corral D; Lopez-Lopez JA
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30621614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single-center randomized control trial.
    Wang X; Zhang C; Li X; Qi H; Liu Q; Lei J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 154(3):436-443. PubMed ID: 33336360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.
    De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Khoury AN; Zhou QP; Gorenberg DM; Nies BM; Manley GE; Mecklenburg FE
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsahly N; Alamoudi R; Almansouri N; Alsinani N; Alkafy S; Rozzah R; Abduljabbar H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):405.e1-405.e6. PubMed ID: 27986461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Agarwal N; Gupta A; Kriplani A; Bhatla N; Parul
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Jun; 29(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 12841697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.