These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2674831)
1. The effect of lesion size, restorative material, and film speed on the detection of recurrent caries. Matteson SR; Phillips C; Kantor ML; Leinedecker T Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 2674831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography. Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiopacity of restorations and detection of secondary caries. Espelid I; Tveit AB; Erickson RL; Keck SC; Glasspoole EA Dent Mater; 1991 Apr; 7(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 1936639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries. Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertical angulation of the X-ray beam and radiographic diagnosis of secondary caries. Tveit AB; Espelid I; Erickson RL; Glasspoole EA Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1991 Dec; 19(6):333-5. PubMed ID: 1837258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT. Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic detection of recurrent carious lesions associated with composite restorations. Goshima T; Goshima Y Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Aug; 70(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 2290656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques. Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations. Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic identification of simulated carious lesions in relation to fillings with Adaptic Radiopaque. Sewerin I Scand J Dent Res; 1980 Oct; 88(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 6936764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries. Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials. Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CBCT and intraoral radiography for proximal caries detection in the presence of different dental restoration materials. Mosavat F; Ahmadi E; Amirfarhangi S; Rafeie N BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):419. PubMed ID: 37353807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay. Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions. Sousa Melo SL; Belem MDF; Prieto LT; Tabchoury CPM; Haiter-Neto F Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Sep; 124(3):306-314. PubMed ID: 28690085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images. Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grey discoloration for the diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Rudolphy MP; van Loveren C; van Amerongen JP Caries Res; 1996; 30(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 8860028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations. Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between gap width and recurrent dental caries beneath occlusal margins of amalgam restorations. Hodges DJ; Mangum FI; Ward MT Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 23(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 7587139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition. Varpio M Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]