These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2674831)

  • 21. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiographic versus clinical extension of Class II carious lesions using an F-speed film.
    Kooistra S; Dennison JB; Yaman P; Burt BA; Taylor GW
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 16382594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiographic diagnosis of caries and marginal defects in connection with radiopaque composite fillings.
    Tveit AB; Espelid I
    Dent Mater; 1986 Aug; 2(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3462061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiographic secondary caries prevalence in teeth with clinically defective restorations.
    Hewlett ER; Atchison KA; White SC; Flack V
    J Dent Res; 1993 Dec; 72(12):1604-8. PubMed ID: 8254130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity of bite-wings for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with occlusal amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Rudolphy MP; van Amerongen JP; Penning C; ten Cate JM
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 8402808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro performance of the DIAGNOcam for detecting proximal carious lesions adjacent to composite restorations.
    Elhennawy K; Askar H; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Reda S; Al-Abdi A; Paris S; Schwendicke F
    J Dent; 2018 May; 72():39-43. PubMed ID: 29526667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Mjör IA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Oct; 136(10):1426-33. PubMed ID: 16255468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity of radiographs for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Rudolphy MP; Gorter Y; van Loveren C; van Amerongen JP
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A clinical comparison between xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of recurrent caries.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Apr; 65(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 3163139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A clinical evaluation of air-abrasion treatment of questionable carious lesions. A 12-month report.
    Hamilton JC; Dennison JB; Stoffers KW; Welch KB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jun; 132(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 11433855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of the diagnostic yield from bitewing radiographs of small approximal and occlusal carious lesions in a low prevalence sample in vitro using different film types and speeds.
    Ricketts DN; Whaites EJ; Kidd EA; Brown JE; Wilson RF
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jan; 182(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 9033139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Artificially formed carieslike lesions around restorative materials.
    Hattab FN; Mok NY; Agnew EC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Feb; 118(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 2493042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The radiographic investigation of the visibility of secondary caries adjacent to the gingiva in Class II amalgam restorations.
    Kandemir S
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jun; 28(6):387-92. PubMed ID: 9477902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode.
    Cebe F; Aktan AM; Ozsevik AS; Ciftci ME; Surmelioglu HD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 28111155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of clinical axial extension of Class II caries lesions with ultraspeed and digital radiographs: an in-vivo study.
    Bin-Shuwaish M; Dennison JB; Yaman P; Neiva G
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 19051853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations.
    ten Cate JM; van Duinen RN
    J Dent Res; 1995 Jun; 74(6):1266-71. PubMed ID: 7629335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.