180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2674888)
1. Medical ethics in the courtroom: the need for scrutiny.
Pellegrino ED; Sharpe VA
Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(4):547-64. PubMed ID: 2674888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial feeding and the right to die. The legal issues.
Snyder L
J Leg Med; 1988 Sep; 9(3):349-75. PubMed ID: 3147314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Weakening the bonds of friendship: an unfortunate outcome of the Cruzan decisions.
Loewy EH
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Jan; 39(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 1987259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The due process of dying.
Flick MR
Calif Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 79(4):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11659478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical ethics.
Pellegrino ED
JAMA; 1986 Oct; 256(15):2122-4. PubMed ID: 11643932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The incompetent's right to die: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Feb; 8(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 624618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond theological conflict in the courts: the issue of assisted suicide.
Dyck AJ
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):503-35. PubMed ID: 11653003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases.
King JC
Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics committees in the courts.
Wolf SM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Jun; 16(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 3721842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Philosophical, ethical, and legal aspects of resuscitation medicine. II. Recognizing the tragic choice: food, water, and the right to assisted suicide.
Schaffner KF
Crit Care Med; 1988 Oct; 16(10):1063-8. PubMed ID: 3139366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
Dunphy SM; Cross JH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia?
Banja JD
J Neurosurg Nurs; 1990 Apr; 22(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11659424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The killing words? How the new quality-of-life ethic affects people with severe disabilities.
HarveyParedes T
SMU Law Rev; 1992; 46(3):805-40. PubMed ID: 11659757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
Weinberg JK
Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Being a physician and being ethical.
Dyck AJ
Linacre Q; 1992 Aug; 59(3):82-90. PubMed ID: 11651450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dying at the right time: a critical legal theory approach to timing-of-death issues.
Ikuta SS
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):3-66. PubMed ID: 2695495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The issue of personal choice: the competent incurable patient and the right to commit suicide?
Morgan RC; Marks TC; Harty-Golder B
Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 11651516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die.
Ellman IM
Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
