These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26748965)

  • 21. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage of nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite sandwich Class II restoration: effect of simultaneous bonding.
    Shafiei F; Akbarian S
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E22-30. PubMed ID: 23865583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser or diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of class V cavities restored with different adhesives and composite systems.
    Yaman BC; Guray BE; Dorter C; Gomeç Y; Yazıcıoglu O; Erdilek D
    Lasers Med Sci; 2012 Jul; 27(4):785-94. PubMed ID: 21845398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of an intermediary base on the microleakage of simulated class II composite resin restorations.
    Giorgi MC; Hernandes NM; Sugii MM; Ambrosano GM; Marchi GM; Lima DA; Aguiar FH
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 23937406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 19544820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of Enamel and Dentinal Microleakage in Class II Silorane-Based and Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite Restorations Using Specific and Nonspecific Adhesives.
    Mousavinasab SM; Ghasemi M; Yadollahi M
    J Dent (Tehran); 2018 Jul; 15(4):240-249. PubMed ID: 30405733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
    Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of fiber inserts on gingival margin microleakage of Class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Shafiei F; Doozandeh M; Karimi V
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(3):58-63. PubMed ID: 29714702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites.
    Civelek A; Ersoy M; L'Hotelier E; Soyman M; Say EC
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 14531612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage evaluation of a new low-shrinkage composite restorative material.
    Yamazaki PC; Bedran-Russo AK; Pereira PN; Wsift EJ
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 17153975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage and microtensile bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based restorative systems.
    Santos MJ; Podorieszach A; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013; 34 Spec No 8():19-24. PubMed ID: 24568172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
    Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.
    Leevailoj C; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Moore BK; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H; Tahvildarnejad N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17277834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative evaluation of microleakage in class II cavities restored with Ceram X and Filtek P-90: An in vitro study.
    Bogra P; Gupta S; Kumar S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Jan; 3(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22557890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.