These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26749873)

  • 1. A Contemporary Approach to Intraoral Optical Scanning and In-Office 3-D Printing.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Today; 2015 Dec; 34(12):46-7. PubMed ID: 26749873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery.
    Flügge TV; Nelson K; Schmelzeisen R; Metzger MC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 71(8):1340-6. PubMed ID: 23866950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New Technologies Shape the Future of Dentistry.
    Feuerstein P; Adams D
    Dent Today; 2015 Feb; 34(2):88, 90, 92 passim. PubMed ID: 26349254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digitally enhanced dentistry: the power of digital design.
    Guichet D
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Mar; 43(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 25864301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fabrication of obturator prosthesis by fusing CBCT and digital impression data.
    Murat S; Gürbüz A; Kamburoğlu K
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(4):335-344. PubMed ID: 30539176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Stapleton BM; Lin WS; Ntounis A; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 24831749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolving e-practice. In-office digital dentistry: cutting-edge technologies for impression capture, restorative design, and prosthesis fabrication.
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 19583166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report.
    Lanis A; Álvarez Del Canto O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The current status of 3D imaging in dental practice.
    McNamara C; House K; Davies R; Barker CS; Chawla O; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
    Dent Update; 2011 Dec; 38(10):679-82, 684-6, 688-90. PubMed ID: 22408888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantum leap in dental technology.
    Pugliese R
    Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 2007; 74(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 17427583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restoratively driven implant dentistry utilizing advanced software and CBCT: realistic abutments and virtual teeth.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2008 Jul; 27(7):122, 124, 126-7. PubMed ID: 18686668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual techniques for designing and fabricating a retainer.
    Nasef AA; El-Beialy AR; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 25172262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Today's CAD/CAM: flexible digital technologies expanding workflow options.
    Ferencz JL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Mar; 36(3):222-3. PubMed ID: 25822749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the efficiency of intraoral scanning.
    Liu W; Huang GJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Sep; 48(9):549-54. PubMed ID: 25329628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate implant placement. Digital scanning and use of tooth-guided, tooth-supported surgical guides.
    Jones PE
    Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):124, 126, 128. PubMed ID: 24358550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method.
    Tahmaseb A; van de Weijden JJ; Mercelis P; De Clerck R; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 20369082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions.
    Henkel GL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Aug; 28(8):422-4, 426-8, 430-1. PubMed ID: 18578100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate Implant Prosthesis Via Guided Bone Reduction.
    Ahuja S; Egbert N; Wicks R; Brandt R
    Dent Today; 2015 Jul; 34(7):142-5. PubMed ID: 26285350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication.
    Kattadiyil MT; Mursic Z; AlRumaih H; Goodacre CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):444-8. PubMed ID: 24882595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.