These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26750340)

  • 21. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Covariate-adjusted confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Shoukri MM; Donner A; El-Dali A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):244-53. PubMed ID: 23871746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bootstrap model selection had similar performance for selecting authentic and noise variables compared to backward variable elimination: a simulation study.
    Austin PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1009-17.e1. PubMed ID: 18539429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
    Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A bootstrap version of the Hausman test to assess the impact of cluster-level endogeneity beyond the random intercept model.
    Talloen W; Loeys T; Moerkerke B
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 30663379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Testing homogeneity of proportion ratios for stratified correlated bilateral data in two-arm randomized clinical trials.
    Pei Y; Tian GL; Tang ML
    Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(25):4370-86. PubMed ID: 24974954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of methods for constructing confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects.
    Cheung MW
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):425-38. PubMed ID: 19363183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating individual treatment effects from multiple-baseline data: a Monte Carlo study of multilevel-modeling approaches.
    Ferron JM; Farmer JL; Owens CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):930-43. PubMed ID: 21139160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of histamine release assays using the Bootstrap.
    Coberly WA; Price JA
    J Immunol Methods; 2005 Jan; 296(1-2):103-14. PubMed ID: 15680155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing Mediational Models: Testing and Interval Estimation for Indirect Effects.
    Biesanz JC; Falk CF; Savalei V
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Aug; 45(4):661-701. PubMed ID: 26735714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of prosthetic valve hydrodynamic function: objective testing using statistical multilevel modeling.
    Bernacca GM; McColl JH; Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):467-77. PubMed ID: 15222295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the mean correlation corrected for Case IV range restriction: a more adequate procedure for meta-analysis.
    Li JC; Cui Y; Chan W
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 23088495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
    Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bootstrap-based methods for estimating standard errors in Cox's regression analyses of clustered event times.
    Xiao Y; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):915-23. PubMed ID: 20213705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Propensity score methods for estimating relative risks in cluster randomized trials with low-incidence binary outcomes and selection bias.
    Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(20):3556-75. PubMed ID: 24771662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Note on Testing Mediated Effects in Structural Equation Models: Reconciling Past and Current Research on the Performance of the Test of Joint Significance.
    Valente MJ; Gonzalez O; Miočević M; MacKinnon DP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Dec; 76(6):889-911. PubMed ID: 27833175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bootstrap estimation of confidence intervals on mutation rate ratios.
    Russell MS; March JC
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2011 Jun; 52(5):385-96. PubMed ID: 21630358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. POWER ANALYSIS FOR COMPLEX MEDIATIONAL DESIGNS USING MONTE CARLO METHODS.
    Thoemmes F; Mackinnon DP; Reiser MR
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2010; 17(3):510-534. PubMed ID: 23935262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.