225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26750425)
1. The US Supreme Court and the Future of Reproductive Health.
Rosenbaum S
Milbank Q; 2016 Mar; 94(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 26750425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolving State-Based Contraceptive and Abortion Policies.
Mallampati D; Simon MA; Janiak E
JAMA; 2017 Jun; 317(24):2481-2482. PubMed ID: 28558101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceived and insurance-related barriers to the provision of contraceptive services in U.S. abortion care settings.
Kavanaugh ML; Jones RK; Finer LB
Womens Health Issues; 2011; 21(3 Suppl):S26-31. PubMed ID: 21530835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court rules, and it's both good and bad news for reproductive health.
Sonfield A; Gold RB
Contraception; 2012 Nov; 86(5):427-9. PubMed ID: 22959903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion opponents win dispute.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Mar; ():A14. PubMed ID: 16528875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right's reasons: constitutional conflict and the spread of woman-protective antiabortion argument.
Siegel RB
Duke Law J; 2008 Apr; 57(6):1641-92. PubMed ID: 19108356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Family planning policy in the United States: the converging politics of abortion and contraception.
Aiken AR; Scott JG
Contraception; 2016 May; 93(5):412-20. PubMed ID: 26794846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion-pill challenge provokes doubt from US Supreme Court.
Lenharo M
Nature; 2024 Apr; 628(8006):17-18. PubMed ID: 38538891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Of paradox and plausibility: the dynamic of change in medical law.
Harrington J
Med Law Rev; 2014; 22(3):305-24. PubMed ID: 24478446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. US Supreme Court protects access to abortion medication.
Jaffe S
Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2679-2680. PubMed ID: 38909610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Access denied? Top healthcare challenge could be finding long-lasting solutions to system's ills.
May D
Mod Healthc; 2011 Nov; 41(47):26. PubMed ID: 22175213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Leaked Supreme Court Ruling Opinion: Implications for Abortion Access.
Reingold RB; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 35666522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Access to health care for millions in the balance as US Supreme Court reviews federal subsidies for insurance.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):454. PubMed ID: 25647191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion law today.
Field MA
J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The ACA decision: law and philosophy.
Kaebnick GE
Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; 42(5):2. PubMed ID: 22976400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Title X: Moving Forward or Backward on Women's Health?
Mason DJ; David L
JAMA; 2019 Jan; 321(3):236-237. PubMed ID: 30601887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Family planning services at school-based health centers: findings from a national survey.
Fothergill K; Feijoo A
J Adolesc Health; 2000 Sep; 27(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 10960214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Obstacles to Care Mount 1 Year After Dobbs Decision.
Verma N; Grossman D
JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(2):119-120. PubMed ID: 37351896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supreme Court considers cases on abortion and contraception ... another challenge to the ACA ... state all-payer databases.
Schencker L
Mod Healthc; 2016 Jan; 46(1):20. PubMed ID: 27086380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
Charo RA
N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
