These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26751058)
1. Application of Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Cervical Disc: 10-Year Follow-up Results in China. Zhao Y; Zhang Y; Sun Y; Pan S; Zhou F; Liu Z Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 26751058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc: a minimum 6-year follow-up study. Zeng J; Liu H; Rong X; Wang B; Yang Y; Gao X; Wu T; Hong Y BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Aug; 19(1):285. PubMed ID: 30086733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc: long-term X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up results. Zhao YB; Sun Y; Chen ZQ; Liu ZJ Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Nov; 123(21):2999-3002. PubMed ID: 21162945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty. Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Hipp JA; Wharton ND; Anderson PA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):991-6. PubMed ID: 21358477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Quan GM; Vital JM; Hansen S; Pointillart V Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(8):639-46. PubMed ID: 21178838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double-level cervical total disc replacement for adjacent segment disease: is it a useful treatment? Description of late onset heterotopic ossification and review of the literature. Barbagallo GM; Certo F; Visocchi M; Sciacca G; Albanese V Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(1 Suppl):15-23. PubMed ID: 24825036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences between C3-4 and other subaxial levels of cervical disc arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification at the 5-year follow-up. Chang PY; Chang HK; Wu JC; Huang WC; Fay LY; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):752-9. PubMed ID: 26824584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analysis of effectiveness and incidence of heterotopic ossification after single-level Bryan cervical artificial disc replacement]. Liu W; Zhu B; Liu X; Sun Y Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 26(6):699-702. PubMed ID: 22792767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: Clinical article. Wu JC; Huang WC; Tsai HW; Ko CC; Fay LY; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 22443547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of carpentry on heterotopic ossification and mobility in cervical arthroplasty: determination by computed tomography with a minimum 2-year follow-up: Clinical article. Tu TH; Wu JC; Huang WC; Wu CL; Ko CC; Cheng H J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 22462570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Heidecke V; Burkert W; Brucke M; Rainov NG Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2008 May; 150(5):453-9; discussion 459. PubMed ID: 18421412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The intermediate clinical outcome and its limitations of Bryan cervical arthroplasty for treatment of cervical disc herniation. Ren X; Wang W; Chu T; Wang J; Li C; Jiang T J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun; 24(4):221-9. PubMed ID: 20634725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the Bryan and Prodisc-C devices. Ryu KS; Park CK; Jun SC; Huh HY J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 20809721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with a new prosthesis. Miao J; Yu F; Shen Y; He N; Kuang Y; Wang X; Chen D Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):878-83. PubMed ID: 24095101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression. Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty. Sasso RC; Best NM J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A long-term follow-up study on the occurrence of heterotopic ossification after artificial cervical disc replacement with Discover disc]. Tian Y; Wei LX; Chen HJ; Wang XW; Cao P; Liu Y; Yuan W Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 100(45):3584-3589. PubMed ID: 33333681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical spine kinematics after anterior cervical discectomy with or without implantation of a mobile cervical disc prosthesis; an RCT. Boselie TF; van Mameren H; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():34. PubMed ID: 25887569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up. Pointillart V; Castelain JE; Coudert P; Cawley DT; Gille O; Vital JM Int Orthop; 2018 Apr; 42(4):851-857. PubMed ID: 29288377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Ryu WH; Kowalczyk I; Duggal N Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 23578991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]