These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26751061)

  • 1. Complications and Rates of Subsequent Lumbar Surgery Following Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Lumbar Fusion.
    Eliasberg CD; Kelly MP; Ajiboye RM; SooHoo NF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 26751061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costs of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: an analysis of the Blue Health Intelligence database for acute and long-term costs and complications.
    Radcliff K; Zigler J; Zigler J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(8):521-9. PubMed ID: 25868092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Total Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Interbody Fusion in the Lumbar Spine Have Relatively a Few Differences in Readmission and Short-term Adverse Events.
    Shultz BN; Wilson AT; Ondeck NT; Bovonratwet P; McLynn RP; Cui JJ; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jan; 43(1):E52-E59. PubMed ID: 28723873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials.
    Nunley PD; Jawahar A; Kerr EJ; Gordon CJ; Cavanaugh DA; Birdsong EM; Stocks M; Danielson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 21587111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up.
    Guyer RD; Pettine K; Roh JS; Dimmig TA; Coric D; McAfee PC; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in hybrid constructs for multi-level lumbar degenerative disc disease.
    Lackey A; Phan K; Mobbs R
    J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 34():23-29. PubMed ID: 27475322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of lumbar total disc arthroplasty in military personnel.
    Petilon J; Roth J; Hardenbrook M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 20975590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed formation of a devastating granulomatous process after metal-on-metal lumbar disc arthroplasty.
    Cabraja M; Schmeding M; Koch A; Podrabsky P; Kroppenstedt S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E809-13. PubMed ID: 22089396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.
    Kelly MP; Mok JM; Frisch RF; Tay BK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1171-9. PubMed ID: 21217449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Disease: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study of the MarketScan Database.
    Cole T; Veeravagu A; Zhang M; Azad TD; Desai A; Ratliff JK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1033-8. PubMed ID: 25768690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between total disc replacement and hybrid construct at two lumbar levels with minimum follow-up of two years.
    Andrieu K; Allain J; Longis PM; Steib JP; Beaurain J; Delécrin J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 103(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 27771427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up.
    Jackson RJ; Davis RJ; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Hisey MS; Kim KD; Gaede SE; Nunley PD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):734-45. PubMed ID: 26799118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reoperation and complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty: a study of 52,395 cases.
    Kelly MP; Eliasberg CD; Riley MS; Ajiboye RM; SooHoo NF
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1432-1439. PubMed ID: 29605899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year results of lumbar disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.
    Aghayev E; Etter C; Bärlocher C; Sgier F; Otten P; Heini P; Hausmann O; Maestretti G; Baur M; Porchet F; Markwalder TM; Schären S; Neukamp M; Röder C
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2114-26. PubMed ID: 24947182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement at short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up.
    Perfetti DC; Galina JM; Derman PB; Guyer RD; Ohnmeiss DD; Satin AM
    Spine J; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1110-1117. PubMed ID: 33640583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Verma K; Gandhi SD; Maltenfort M; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR; Radcliff KE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2253-7. PubMed ID: 24335631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the Rate of Revision Discectomies After Primary Discectomy on a National Scale?
    Virk SS; Diwan A; Phillips FM; Sandhu H; Khan SN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Nov; 475(11):2752-2762. PubMed ID: 28849429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical characteristics and reoperation of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration postoperation of lumbar fusion].
    Sun HL; Li CD; Liu XY; Yi XD; Liu H; Lu HL; Li H; Yu ZR; Zhao S
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Dec; 44(6):855-9. PubMed ID: 23247445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.