These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26751184)

  • 1. Fitting the Normal-Ogive Factor Analytic Model to Scores on Tests.
    Ferrando PJ; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2001 Jul; 36(3):445-69. PubMed ID: 26751184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interchangeability between factor analysis, logistic IRT, and normal ogive IRT.
    Cho E
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1267219. PubMed ID: 37818417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
    Macaskill P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretical and Empirical Comparisons between Two Models for Continuous Item Response.
    Ferrando PJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Oct; 37(4):521-42. PubMed ID: 26816326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Multidimensional Ideal Point Item Response Theory Model for Binary Data.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Hernández A; McDonald RP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Dec; 41(4):445-72. PubMed ID: 26794914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Impact of Faking on Binary Personality Measures: An IRT-Based Multiple-Group Factor Analytic Procedure.
    Ferrando PJ; Anguiano-Carrasco C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2009 Jul; 44(4):497-524. PubMed ID: 26735594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factor analytic approaches to personality item-level data.
    Panter AT; Swygert KA; Grant Dahlstrom W; Tanaka JS
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Jun; 68(3):561-89. PubMed ID: 16372867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marketing fast food: impact of fast food restaurants in children's hospitals.
    Sahud HB; Binns HJ; Meadow WL; Tanz RR
    Pediatrics; 2006 Dec; 118(6):2290-7. PubMed ID: 17142511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factor Analytic Procedures for Assessing Social Desirability in Binary Items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2005; 40(3):331-49. PubMed ID: 26794687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adolescent Purchasing Behavior at McDonald's and Subway.
    Lesser LI; Kayekjian KC; Velasquez P; Tseng CH; Brook RH; Cohen DA
    J Adolesc Health; 2013 Oct; 53(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 23660412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized latent variable models with non-linear effects.
    Rizopoulos D; Moustaki I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):415-38. PubMed ID: 17535487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible Item Response Models for Count Data: The Count Thresholds Model.
    Tutz G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Nov; 46(8):643-661. PubMed ID: 36262521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.
    Meade AW; Johnson EC; Braddy PW
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 May; 93(3):568-92. PubMed ID: 18457487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functionally Unidimensional Item Response Models for Multivariate Binary Data.
    Ip EH; Molenberghs G; Chen SH; Goegebeur Y; De Boeck P
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2013 Jul; 48(4):534-62. PubMed ID: 26742004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stochastic EM for estimating the parameters of a multilevel IRT model.
    Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):65-81. PubMed ID: 12803822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reexamining the factor structure of the 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale: commentary on Gignac, Palmer, and Stough.
    Bagby RM; Taylor GJ; Quilty LC; Parker JD
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Dec; 89(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18001226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measures of variability in chaplaincy, health care, and related research.
    Flannelly KJ; Jankowski KR; Flannelly LT
    J Health Care Chaplain; 2015; 21(3):122-30. PubMed ID: 26207906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining the structure of emotional intelligence at the item level: new perspectives, new conclusions.
    Maul A
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 21787251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lower Bounds to the Reliabilities of Factor Score Estimators.
    Hessen DJ
    Psychometrika; 2016 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 27714542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.