These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26751208)

  • 1. Effects of Photo and Genotype-Based Misidentification Error on Estimates of Survival, Detection and State Transition using Multistate Survival Models.
    Winiarski KJ; McGarigal K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0145640. PubMed ID: 26751208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum likelihood estimation for model Mt,α for capture-recapture data with misidentification.
    Vale RT; Fewster RM; Carroll EL; Patenaude NJ
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):962-71. PubMed ID: 24942186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trap array configuration influences estimates and precision of black bear density and abundance.
    Wilton CM; Puckett EE; Beringer J; Gardner B; Eggert LS; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e111257. PubMed ID: 25350557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferring past demographic changes from contemporary genetic data: A simulation-based evaluation of the ABC methods implemented in diyabc.
    Cabrera AA; Palsbøll PJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):e94-e110. PubMed ID: 28654208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.
    Paterson JT; Proffitt K; Jimenez B; Rotella J; Garrott R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215458. PubMed ID: 31002709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A bayesian approach to the multistate Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model.
    Dupuis JA; Schwarz CJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1015-22. PubMed ID: 17501941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables.
    Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Melting of a finite-sized two-dimensional colloidal crystal.
    Tanaka S; Oki Y; Kimura Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 May; 89(5):052305. PubMed ID: 25353798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of a two-stage cluster sampling design to estimate the total number of owned dogs.
    Baquero OS; Amaku M; Dias RA; Grisi Filho JHH; Ferreira Neto JS; Ferreira F
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Mar; 151():40-45. PubMed ID: 29496104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating parameters of hidden Markov models based on marked individuals: use of robust design data.
    Kendall WL; White GC; Hines JE; Langtimm CA; Yoshizaki J
    Ecology; 2012 Apr; 93(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 22690641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review and comparison of methods for recreating individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves for economic evaluations: a simulation study.
    Wan X; Peng L; Li Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121353. PubMed ID: 25803659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When can noninvasive samples provide sufficient information in conservation genetics studies?
    Smith O; Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Sep; 14(5):1011-23. PubMed ID: 24620908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models.
    Moineddin R; Matheson FI; Glazier RH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():34. PubMed ID: 17634107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
    Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias, precision, and parameter redundancy in complex multistate models with unobservable states.
    Bailey LL; Converse SJ; Kendall WL
    Ecology; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1598-604. PubMed ID: 20583702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pooled population parameter from mark-recapture data.
    Hargrove JW; Borland CH
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1129-41. PubMed ID: 7786993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of genotype error rate using samples with pedigree information--an application on the GeneChip Mapping 10K array.
    Hao K; Li C; Rosenow C; Hung Wong W
    Genomics; 2004 Oct; 84(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 15475239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of modeling procedure for fitting in situ feed degradation profiles.
    Zanton GI; Heinrichs AJ
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):2080-8. PubMed ID: 19181767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of sample size on estimates of population growth rates calculated with matrix models.
    Fiske IJ; Bruna EM; Bolker BM
    PLoS One; 2008 Aug; 3(8):e3080. PubMed ID: 18769483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.