These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26752578)

  • 1. From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.
    Savard J; Hickerton C; Metcalfe SA; Gaff C; Middleton A; Newson AJ
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 31885332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paternity testing under the cloak of recreational genetics.
    Moray N; Pink KE; Borry P; Larmuseau MH
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Jun; 25(6):768-770. PubMed ID: 28272533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discouraging Elective Genetic Testing of Minors: A Norm under Siege in a New Era of Genomic Medicine.
    Hercher L
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2020 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 31548217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new approach to assessing affect and the emotional implications of personal genomic testing for common disease risk.
    O'Neill SC; Tercyak KP; Baytop C; Hensley Alford S; McBride CM
    Public Health Genomics; 2015; 18(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 25612474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judging risk for multiple diseases: the role of disease worry.
    Senay I; Hensley-Alford S; Kaphingst KA
    J Health Psychol; 2013 Apr; 18(4):554-60. PubMed ID: 22843634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full Collection of Personal Narratives.
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2023; 13(2):70-92. PubMed ID: 38661952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The outcome of prenatal identification of sex chromosome abnormalities.
    Lucas-Herald AK; Cann F; Crawford L; Morrison H; Boroujerdi M; Nelson SM; Ahmed SF; McGowan R
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2016 Sep; 101(5):F423-7. PubMed ID: 26764426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False Negative NIPT Results: Risk Figures for Chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 Based on Chorionic Villi Results in 5967 Cases and Literature Review.
    Van Opstal D; Srebniak MI; Polak J; de Vries F; Govaerts LC; Joosten M; Go AT; Knapen MF; van den Berg C; Diderich KE; Galjaard RJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146794. PubMed ID: 26771677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic Evaluation Alongside a Clinical Trial of Telephone Versus In-Person Genetic Counseling for BRCA1/2 Mutations in Geographically Underserved Areas.
    Chang Y; Near AM; Butler KM; Hoeffken A; Edwards SL; Stroup AM; Kohlmann W; Gammon A; Buys SS; Schwartz MD; Peshkin BN; Kinney AY; Mandelblatt JS; Chang Y; Near AM; Butler KM; Hoeffken A; Edwards SL; Stroup AM; Kohlmann W; Gammon A; Buys SS; Schwartz MD; Peshkin BN; Kinney AY; Mandelblatt JS
    J Oncol Pract; 2016 Jan; 12(1):59, e1-13. PubMed ID: 26759468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Awareness, Interest, and Preferences of Primary Care Providers in Using Point-of-Care Cancer Screening Technology.
    Kim CS; Vanture S; Cho M; Klapperich CM; Wang C; Huang FW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0145215. PubMed ID: 26771309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. WHAT DNA CAN AND CANNOT SAY: PERSPECTIVES OF IMMIGRANT FAMILIES ABOUT THE USE OF GENETIC TESTING IN IMMIGRATION.
    Barata LP; Starks H; Kelley M; Kuszler P; Burke W
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2015; 26():597-638. PubMed ID: 26855553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implications of direct-to-consumer whole-exome sequencing in South Africa.
    Lombard Z; Baine F; Krause A; Lochan A; Macualay S; Spencer C; Aldous C; De Vries J; Fieggen K; Henderson B; Hoal E; Kinnear C; Kinsley N; September A; Urban M; Soodyall H; Pepper M; Ramsay M
    S Afr Med J; 2016 Jan; 106(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 26821891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Privacy-preserving genomic testing in the clinic: a model using HIV treatment.
    McLaren PJ; Raisaro JL; Aouri M; Rotger M; Ayday E; Bartha I; Delgado MB; Vallet Y; Günthard HF; Cavassini M; Furrer H; Doco-Lecompte T; Marzolini C; Schmid P; Di Benedetto C; Decosterd LA; Fellay J; Hubaux JP; Telenti A
    Genet Med; 2016 Aug; 18(8):814-22. PubMed ID: 26765343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. German and Italian Users of Web-Accessed Genetic Data: Attitudes on Personal Utility and Personal Sharing Preferences. Results of a Comparative Survey (n=192).
    Wöhlke S; Schaper M; Oliveri S; Cutica I; Spinella F; Pravettoni G; Steinberger D; Schicktanz S
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():102. PubMed ID: 32265977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "I would rather have it done by a doctor"-laypeople's perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.
    Schaper M; Wöhlke S; Schicktanz S
    Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Mar; 22(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 29705970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personal Narratives of Genetic Testing: Expectations, Emotions, and Impact on Self and Family.
    Anderson EE; Wasson K
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2015; 5(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26752578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In Guanine We Trust: Genetic Testing and the Sense of Coherence.
    DuBois JM; Antes AL
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2015; 5(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 26752579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Test Unlike Any Other.
    Savard J
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2015; 5(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 26752572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Appreciating Uncertainty and Personal Preference in Genetic Testing.
    Kadlac A
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2015; 5(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 26752580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.