BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26752718)

  • 1. Effect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different posterior composite resins.
    Sahbaz C; Bahsi E; Ince B; Bakir EP; Cellik O
    Scanning; 2016 Sep; 38(5):448-454. PubMed ID: 26752718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins.
    Barbosa SH; Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Nunes OB
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16113932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures.
    Daud A; Adams AJ; Shawkat A; Gray G; Wilson NHF; Lynch CD; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2020 Aug; 99():103376. PubMed ID: 32470566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
    Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.
    Tosco V; Monterubbianesi R; Orilisi G; Procaccini M; Grandini S; Putignano A; Orsini G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Aug; 69(4):207-214. PubMed ID: 31633320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites.
    Marghalani HY
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 20433565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Novel Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Morphology of Nanocomposites.
    Aytac F; Karaarslan ES; Agaccioglu M; Tastan E; Buldur M; Kuyucu E
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 Jul; 28(4):247-61. PubMed ID: 27121923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
    Gönülol N; Yilmaz F
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems.
    Borges AB; Marsilio AL; Pagani C; Rodrigues JR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(1):42-7; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 15259542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives.
    Ozgünaltay G; Yazici AR; Görücü J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 30(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 12535151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing.
    Jung M; Bruegger H; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 14653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.