These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26754638)

  • 1. Evaluation of the 2b-RAD method for genomic selection in scallop breeding.
    Dou J; Li X; Fu Q; Jiao W; Li Y; Li T; Wang Y; Hu X; Wang S; Bao Z
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():19244. PubMed ID: 26754638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting Growth Traits with Genomic Selection Methods in Zhikong Scallop (Chlamys farreri).
    Wang Y; Sun G; Zeng Q; Chen Z; Hu X; Li H; Wang S; Bao Z
    Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2018 Dec; 20(6):769-779. PubMed ID: 30116982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies the Genomic Region Associated with Shell Color in Yesso Scallop, Patinopecten yessoensis.
    Zhao L; Li Y; Li Y; Yu J; Liao H; Wang S; Lv J; Liang J; Huang X; Bao Z
    Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2017 Jun; 19(3):301-309. PubMed ID: 28527015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic Prediction of Resistance to Pasteurellosis in Gilthead Sea Bream (
    Palaiokostas C; Ferraresso S; Franch R; Houston RD; Bargelloni L
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Nov; 6(11):3693-3700. PubMed ID: 27652890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction accuracies for growth and wood attributes of interior spruce in space using genotyping-by-sequencing.
    Gamal El-Dien O; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Chen C; Porth I; El-Kassaby YA
    BMC Genomics; 2015 May; 16(1):370. PubMed ID: 25956247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identity-by-descent genomic selection using selective and sparse genotyping for binary traits.
    Ødegård J; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):8. PubMed ID: 25888522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic dissection and prediction of heading date in perennial ryegrass.
    Fè D; Cericola F; Byrne S; Lenk I; Ashraf BH; Pedersen MG; Roulund N; Asp T; Janss L; Jensen CS; Jensen J
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Nov; 16():921. PubMed ID: 26559662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce.
    Beaulieu J; Doerksen TK; MacKay J; Rainville A; Bousquet J
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1048. PubMed ID: 25442968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction of genetic merit using LD-based haplotypes in the Nordic Holstein population.
    Cuyabano BC; Su G; Lund MS
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1171. PubMed ID: 25539631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identity-by-descent genomic selection using selective and sparse genotyping.
    Odegård J; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jan; 46(1):3. PubMed ID: 24444432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Genomic Selection Models to Predict Flowering Time and Spike Grain Number in Two Hexaploid Wheat Doubled Haploid Populations.
    Thavamanikumar S; Dolferus R; Thumma BR
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jul; 5(10):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26206349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative covariance estimator to investigate genetic heterogeneity in populations.
    Heslot N; Jannink JL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():93. PubMed ID: 26612537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection for lentil breeding: Empirical evidence.
    Haile TA; Heidecker T; Wright D; Neupane S; Ramsay L; Vandenberg A; Bett KE
    Plant Genome; 2020 Mar; 13(1):e20002. PubMed ID: 33016638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Persistency of accuracy of genomic breeding values for different simulated pig breeding programs in developing countries.
    Akanno EC; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M; Friendship RM; Robinson JA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Oct; 131(5):367-78. PubMed ID: 24628765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.
    Porto-Neto LR; Barendse W; Henshall JM; McWilliam SM; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():84. PubMed ID: 26525050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.