BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26754743)

  • 1. Cost-minimization analysis of three decision strategies for cardiac revascularization: results of the "suspected CAD" cohort of the european cardiovascular magnetic resonance registry.
    Moschetti K; Petersen SE; Pilz G; Kwong RY; Wasserfallen JB; Lombardi M; Korosoglou G; Van Rossum AC; Bruder O; Mahrholdt H; Schwitter J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Jan; 18():3. PubMed ID: 26754743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-Minimization Analysis for Cardiac Revascularization in 12 Health Care Systems Based on the EuroCMR/SPINS Registries.
    Moschetti K; Kwong RY; Petersen SE; Lombardi M; Garot J; Atar D; Rademakers FE; Sierra-Galan LM; Mavrogeni S; Li K; Fernandes JL; Schneider S; Pinget C; Ge Y; Antiochos P; Deluigi C; Bruder O; Mahrholdt H; Schwitter J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Apr; 15(4):607-625. PubMed ID: 35033498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative cost-effectiveness analyses of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary angiography combined with fractional flow reserve for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Moschetti K; Favre D; Pinget C; Pilz G; Petersen SE; Wagner A; Wasserfallen JB; Schwitter JJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):13. PubMed ID: 24461028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary angiography for the diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: application of the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance registry data to the German, United Kingdom, Swiss, and United States health care systems.
    Moschetti K; Muzzarelli S; Pinget C; Wagner A; Pilz G; Wasserfallen JB; Schulz-Menger J; Nothnagel D; Dill T; Frank H; Lombardi M; Bruder O; Mahrholdt H; Schwitter J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):35. PubMed ID: 22697303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The STRATEGY Study (Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Management of Symptomatic Revascularized Patients): Resources and Outcomes Impact.
    Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Rota C; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Fusini L; Solbiati A; Segurini C; Conte E; Gripari P; Annoni A; Formenti A; Petulla' M; Lombardi F; Muscogiuri G; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 27894070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in suspected coronary artery disease: a net cost analysis and reimbursement implications.
    Pilz G; Patel PA; Fell U; Ladapo JA; Rizzo JA; Fang H; Gunnarsson C; Heer T; Hoefling B
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jan; 27(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 20524070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging for near-term quality of life, cost and radiation exposure: a prospective multicenter randomized pilot trial.
    Min JK; Koduru S; Dunning AM; Cole JH; Hines JL; Greenwell D; Biga C; Fanning G; LaBounty TM; Gomez M; Horowitz JM; Hadimitzsky M; Hausleiter J; Callister TQ; Rosanski AR; Shaw LJ; Berman DS; Lin FY
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(4):274-83. PubMed ID: 22732201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability.
    Ponte M; Bettencourt N; Pereira E; Ferreira ND; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Albuquerque A; Gama V; Nagel E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 30(8):1589-97. PubMed ID: 25082645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease.
    Jogiya R; Kozerke S; Morton G; De Silva K; Redwood S; Perera D; Nagel E; Plein S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 60(8):756-65. PubMed ID: 22818072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve on Management Decision and 1-Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: PRIME-FFR (Insights From the POST-IT [Portuguese Study on the Evaluation of FFR-Guided Treatment of Coronary Disease] and R3F [French FFR Registry] Integrated Multicenter Registries - Implementation of FFR [Fractional Flow Reserve] in Routine Practice).
    Van Belle E; Baptista SB; Raposo L; Henderson J; Rioufol G; Santos L; Pouillot C; Ramos R; Cuisset T; Calé R; Teiger E; Jorge E; Belle L; Machado C; Barreau D; Costa M; Hanssen M; Oliveira E; Besnard C; Costa J; Dallongeville J; Pipa J; Sideris G; Fonseca N; Bretelle C; Guardado J; Lhoest N; Silva B; Barnay P; Sousa MJ; Leborgne L; Silva JC; Vincent F; Rodrigues A; Seca L; Fernandes R; Dupouy P;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28615234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term Cost-Effectiveness of Diagnostic Tests for Assessing Stable Chest Pain: Modeled Analysis of Anatomical and Functional Strategies.
    Bertoldi EG; Stella SF; Rohde LE; Polanczyk CA
    Clin Cardiol; 2016 May; 39(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 27080921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of FFR-derived from CT and stress perfusion CMR with invasive FFR in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis.
    Ghekiere O; Bielen J; Leipsic J; Dewilde W; Mancini I; Hansen D; Dendale P; Nchimi A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 30284138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
    Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-centre study of whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: gender based analysis of diagnostic performance.
    Hamada S; Gotschy A; Wissmann L; Paetsch I; Jahnke C; Plein S; Gebker R; Oebel S; Alkadhi H; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Kozerke S; Manka R
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 18(10):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 28984890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.
    Douglas PS; Pontone G; Hlatky MA; Patel MR; Norgaard BL; Byrne RA; Curzen N; Purcell I; Gutberlet M; Rioufol G; Hink U; Schuchlenz HW; Feuchtner G; Gilard M; Andreini D; Jensen JM; Hadamitzky M; Chiswell K; Cyr D; Wilk A; Wang F; Rogers C; De Bruyne B;
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3359-67. PubMed ID: 26330417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Projected costs and consequences of computed tomography-determined fractional flow reserve.
    Hlatky MA; Saxena A; Koo BK; Erglis A; Zarins CK; Min JK
    Clin Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 36(12):743-8. PubMed ID: 24114863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress Perfusion CMR in Patients With Known and Suspected CAD: Prognostic Value and Optimal Ischemic Threshold for Revascularization.
    Vincenti G; Masci PG; Monney P; Rutz T; Hugelshofer S; Gaxherri M; Muller O; Iglesias JF; Eeckhout E; Lorenzoni V; Pellaton C; Sierro C; Schwitter J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):526-537. PubMed ID: 28412420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina: Comparison of FFR
    Rønnow Sand NP; Nissen L; Winther S; Petersen SE; Westra J; Christiansen EH; Larsen P; Holm NR; Isaksen C; Urbonaviciene G; Deibjerg L; Husain M; Thomsen KK; Rohold A; Bøtker HE; Bøttcher M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Apr; 13(4):994-1004. PubMed ID: 31422146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
    Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.
    Ebersberger U; Makowski MR; Schoepf UJ; Platz U; Schmidtler F; Rose J; Kessel A; Roth P; Antoni D; Schnackenburg B; Helmberger T; Rieber J; Hoffmann E; Leber AW
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.