347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26754852)
1. GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.
Efthimiou O; Debray TP; van Valkenhoef G; Trelle S; Panayidou K; Moons KG; Reitsma JB; Shang A; Salanti G;
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):236-63. PubMed ID: 26754852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GetReal: from efficacy in clinical trials to relative effectiveness in the real world.
Egger M; Moons KG; Fletcher C;
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):278-81. PubMed ID: 27390256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Network Meta-Analysis.
Watt J; Del Giovane C
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2345():187-201. PubMed ID: 34550592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of network meta-analysis in the field of physical activity and health promotion.
Su X; McDonough DJ; Chu H; Quan M; Gao Z
J Sport Health Sci; 2020 Dec; 9(6):511-520. PubMed ID: 32745617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing moderation in network meta-analysis with individual participant data.
Dagne GA; Brown CH; Howe G; Kellam SG; Liu L
Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2485-502. PubMed ID: 26841367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian network meta-analysis for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Uhlmann L; Jensen K; Kieser M
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):236-250. PubMed ID: 27390267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis.
Efthimiou O; Mavridis D; Debray TP; Samara M; Belger M; Siontis GC; Leucht S; Salanti G;
Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1210-1226. PubMed ID: 28083901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool.
Salanti G
Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):80-97. PubMed ID: 26062083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis.
Noma H; Tanaka S; Matsui S; Cipriani A; Furukawa TA
Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):917-927. PubMed ID: 27917493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disconnected by design: analytic approach in treatment networks having no common comparator.
Goring SM; Gustafson P; Liu Y; Saab S; Cline SK; Platt RW
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):420-432. PubMed ID: 27061025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Research Techniques Made Simple: Network Meta-Analysis.
Watt J; Tricco AC; Straus S; Veroniki AA; Naglie G; Drucker AM
J Invest Dermatol; 2019 Jan; 139(1):4-12.e1. PubMed ID: 30579427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.
Hoaglin DC; Hawkins N; Jansen JP; Scott DA; Itzler R; Cappelleri JC; Boersma C; Thompson D; Larholt KM; Diaz M; Barrett A
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 21669367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015.
Petropoulou M; Nikolakopoulou A; Veroniki AA; Rios P; Vafaei A; Zarin W; Giannatsi M; Sullivan S; Tricco AC; Chaimani A; Egger M; Salanti G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 82():20-28. PubMed ID: 27864068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative review of network meta-analysis models in longitudinal randomized controlled trial.
Tallarita M; De Iorio M; Baio G
Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(16):3053-3072. PubMed ID: 31050822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the impact of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Leahy J; Walsh C
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):546-568. PubMed ID: 31368653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating network meta-analysis and inconsistency using arm-parameterized model in structural equation modeling.
Shih MC; Tu YK
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):240-254. PubMed ID: 30834677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making.
Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Egger M; Salanti G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1312-1330. PubMed ID: 27587588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research.
Roever L; Biondi-Zoccai G
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 106(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 27142793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
