These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26756155)

  • 21. The Vibrant Soundbridge in Children and Adolescents: Preliminary European Multicenter Results.
    Frenzel H; Sprinzl G; Streitberger C; Stark T; Wollenberg B; Wolf-Magele A; Giarbini N; Strenger T; Müller J; Hempel JM
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1216-22. PubMed ID: 26107139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Killion MC; Niquette PA; Gudmundsen GI; Revit LJ; Banerjee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2395-405. PubMed ID: 15532670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test.
    Gilbert JL; Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23231814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA; Arora K
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Signal Type and Noise Background on Auditory Evoked Potential N1, P2, and P3 Measurements in Blast-Exposed Veterans.
    Papesh MA; Stefl AA; Gallun FJ; Billings CJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):106-121. PubMed ID: 32520849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN).
    Dawson PW; Hersbach AA; Swanson BA
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 23598772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].
    Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):182-188. PubMed ID: 27538937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A long term effect on speech recognition in the patients with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants].
    Wang B; Wei CG; Cao KL; Jin X; Wang Y; Wang NY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):189-195. PubMed ID: 29614551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor.
    Wolfe J; Neumann S; Marsh M; Schafer E; Lianos L; Gilden J; O'Neill L; Arkis P; Menapace C; Nel E; Jones M
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1181-90. PubMed ID: 26049314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
    Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech perception in noise for bilingual listeners with normal hearing.
    Lucks Mendel L; Widner H
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 26189557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A longitudinal study of speech perception skills and device characteristics of adolescent cochlear implant users.
    Robinson EJ; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Brenner CM; Geers AE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):341-9. PubMed ID: 22533977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT).
    Wong LL; Soli SD; Liu S; Han N; Huang MW
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):70S-74S. PubMed ID: 17496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.