BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26756292)

  • 1. Role of genomics and transcriptomics in selection of reintroduction source populations.
    He X; Johansson ML; Heath DD
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1010-8. PubMed ID: 26756292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal monitoring of neutral and adaptive genomic diversity in a reintroduction.
    Marshall IR; Brauer CJ; Wedderburn SD; Whiterod NS; Hammer MP; Barnes TC; Attard CRM; Möller LM; Beheregaray LB
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):e13889. PubMed ID: 35023224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel holistic framework for genetic-based captive-breeding and reintroduction programs.
    Attard CR; Möller LM; Sasaki M; Hammer MP; Bice CM; Brauer CJ; Carvalho DC; Harris JO; Beheregaray LB
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1060-9. PubMed ID: 26892747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which species, how many, and from where: Integrating habitat suitability, population genomics, and abundance estimates into species reintroduction planning.
    Malone EW; Perkin JS; Leckie BM; Kulp MA; Hurt CR; Walker DM
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Aug; 24(8):3729-3748. PubMed ID: 29543361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Climate suitability as a predictor of conservation translocation failure.
    Bellis J; Bourke D; Maschinski J; Heineman K; Dalrymple S
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Dec; 34(6):1473-1481. PubMed ID: 32304113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advances in the reintroduction of rare and endangered wild plant species.
    Ren H; Jian S; Liu H; Zhang Q; Lu H
    Sci China Life Sci; 2014 Jun; 57(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 24824586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of genomics in conservation and reproductive sciences.
    Johnson WE; Koepfli K
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 753():71-96. PubMed ID: 25091907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal analysis of genetic structure to assess population dynamics of reintroduced swift foxes.
    Cullingham CI; Moehrenschlager A
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1389-98. PubMed ID: 24033503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ex situ collections and their potential for the restoration of extinct plants.
    Abeli T; Dalrymple S; Godefroid S; Mondoni A; Müller JV; Rossi G; Orsenigo S
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):303-313. PubMed ID: 31329316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of genetic, climatic, and microbiological data to inform reintroduction of a regionally extinct butterfly.
    Dincă V; Bálint Z; Vodă R; Dapporto L; Hebert PDN; Vila R
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):828-837. PubMed ID: 29569277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating geodiversity into conservation decisions.
    Comer PJ; Pressey RL; Hunter ML; Schloss CA; Buttrick SC; Heller NE; Tirpak JM; Faith DP; Cross MS; Shaffer ML
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 25923052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using environmental heterogeneity to plan for sea-level rise.
    Hunter EA; Nibbelink NP
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1409-1417. PubMed ID: 28240439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using environmental and geographic data to optimize ex situ collections and preserve evolutionary potential.
    N Di Santo L; Hamilton JA
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):733-744. PubMed ID: 32519757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying correlates of success and failure of native freshwater fish reintroductions.
    Cochran-Biederman JL; Wyman KE; French WE; Loppnow GL
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 25115187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Organisms and responses to environmental change.
    Peck LS
    Mar Genomics; 2011 Dec; 4(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 22118635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gut microbiome as a key monitoring indicator for reintroductions of captive animals.
    Huang G; Qi D; Yang Z; Hou R; Shi W; Zhao F; Li Z; Yan L; Wei F
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Feb; 38(1):e14173. PubMed ID: 37650395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conservation Genomics in a Changing Arctic.
    Colella JP; Talbot SL; Brochmann C; Taylor EB; Hoberg EP; Cook JA
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2020 Feb; 35(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 31699414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From conservation genetics to conservation genomics.
    Primmer CR
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():357-68. PubMed ID: 19432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The face of conservation responding to a dynamically changing world.
    Wiederholt R; Trainor AM; Michel N; Shirey PD; Swaisgood RR; Tallamy D; Cook-Patton SC
    Integr Zool; 2015 Sep; 10(5):436-52. PubMed ID: 26201263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting for tolerance against pathogens and herbivores to enhance success of reintroduction and translocation.
    Venesky MD; Mendelson Iii JR; Sears BF; Stiling P; Rohr JR
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Aug; 26(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 22809350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.