1420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26756460)
1. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.
Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
Trentham-Dietz A; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Schechter CB; Ergun MA; van den Broek JJ; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; van Ravesteyn NT; Near AM; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Chandler Y; de Koning HJ; Mandelblatt JS; Tosteson AN;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 165(10):700-712. PubMed ID: 27548583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
Nelson HD; Pappas M; Cantor A; Griffin J; Daeges M; Humphrey L
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):256-67. PubMed ID: 26756737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.
Nelson HD; O'Meara ES; Kerlikowske K; Balch S; Miglioretti D
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 26756902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
Siu AL;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):279-96. PubMed ID: 26757170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50-69 years is minimal.
Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Olerud HM; Hole EO; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1174-9. PubMed ID: 24311702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 21081671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.
Hendrick RE
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 20736332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.
van Ravesteyn NT; Miglioretti DL; Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Buist DS; Huang H; Heijnsdijk EA; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Near AM; Kerlikowske K; Nelson HD; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ
Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(9):609-17. PubMed ID: 22547470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimated risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening for young BRCA mutation carriers.
Berrington de Gonzalez A; Berg CD; Visvanathan K; Robson M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Feb; 101(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 19176458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
US Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening in 75 + Women to Inform Shared Decision-making: a Simulation Modeling Study.
Jayasekera J; Stein S; Wilson OWA; Wojcik KM; Kamil D; Røssell EL; Abraham LA; O'Meara ES; Schoenborn NL; Schechter CB; Mandelblatt JS; Schonberg MA; Stout NK
J Gen Intern Med; 2024 Feb; 39(3):428-439. PubMed ID: 38010458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
Nelson HD; Fu R; Cantor A; Pappas M; Daeges M; Humphrey L
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):244-55. PubMed ID: 26756588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits and harms of mammography screening after age 74 years: model estimates of overdiagnosis.
van Ravesteyn NT; Stout NK; Schechter CB; Heijnsdijk EA; Alagoz O; Trentham-Dietz A; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jul; 107(7):. PubMed ID: 25948872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.
Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
