BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26756812)

  • 1. Dosimetric characteristics of brass mesh as bolus under megavoltage photon irradiation.
    Richmond ND; Daniel JM; Whitbourn JR; Greenhalgh AD
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1059):20150796. PubMed ID: 26756812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Dosimetric Properties of Brass Mesh Bolus for High-energy Photon Beam].
    Hara H; Shibayama Y; Fukunaga JI; Hirose TA; Matsumoto R; Komiya I; Kato T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 May; 79(5):453-461. PubMed ID: 36927669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical implementation of brass mesh bolus for chest wall postmastectomy radiotherapy and film dosimetry for surface dose estimates.
    Lobo D; Banerjee S; Saxena PU; Ravichandran R; Srinivas C; Putha SK; Kasturi DP
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(5):1042-1050. PubMed ID: 31603108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric assessment of brass mesh bolus for postmastectomy photon radiotherapy.
    Manger R; Paxton A; Cerviño L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(6):86-96. PubMed ID: 27929484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric effects of brass mesh bolus on skin dose and dose at depth for postmastectomy chest wall irradiation.
    Al-Rahbi ZS; Cutajar DL; Metcalfe P; Rosenfeld AB
    Phys Med; 2018 Oct; 54():84-93. PubMed ID: 30337014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A single plan solution to chest wall radiotherapy with bolus?
    Ordonez-Sanz C; Bowles S; Hirst A; MacDougall ND
    Br J Radiol; 2014 May; 87(1037):20140035. PubMed ID: 24646288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy of treatment planning system dose modelling in the presence of brass mesh bolus.
    Richmond N
    Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2017; 22(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28761391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in wedge factor determination in air using a PMMA mini-phantom or a brass build-up cap.
    Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1986-91. PubMed ID: 9434981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetric characteristics of unflattened 6 MV photon beams of a clinical linear accelerator: a Monte Carlo study.
    Mesbahi A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Sep; 65(9):1029-36. PubMed ID: 17616465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams.
    Künzler T; Fotina I; Stock M; Georg D
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7363-77. PubMed ID: 19934489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetric assessment of brass mesh bolus and transparent polymer-gel type bolus for commonly used breast treatment delivery techniques.
    Fiedler DA; Hoffman S; Roeske JC; Hentz CL; Small W; Kang H
    Med Dosim; 2021 Autumn; 46(3):e10-e14. PubMed ID: 33536152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetric properties of a flattening filter-free 6-MV photon beam: a Monte Carlo study.
    Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Farajollahi A
    Radiat Med; 2007 Aug; 25(7):315-24. PubMed ID: 17705000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
    Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo simulation of the photon beam characteristics from medical linear accelerators.
    Kim HK; Han SJ; Kim JL; Kim BH; Chang SY; Lee JK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):510-3. PubMed ID: 16644954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET detectors for high-energy photon beams using the PENELOPE code.
    Panettieri V; Duch MA; Jornet N; Ginjaume M; Carrasco P; Badal A; Ortega X; Ribas M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):303-16. PubMed ID: 17183143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10MV unflattened photon beams.
    Kragl G; af Wetterstedt S; Knäusl B; Lind M; McCavana P; Knöös T; McClean B; Georg D
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 19592123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultra-thin TLDs for skin dose determination in high energy photon beams.
    Stathakis S; Li JS; Paskalev K; Yang J; Wang L; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3549-67. PubMed ID: 16825748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo correction factors for a Farmer 0.6 cm3 ion chamber dose measurement in the build-up region of the 6 MV clinical beam.
    Pena J; Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Terrón JA; Gómez F
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16510960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flattening filter free beams in SBRT and IMRT: dosimetric assessment of peripheral doses.
    Kragl G; Baier F; Lutz S; Albrich D; Dalaryd M; Kroupa B; Wiezorek T; Knöös T; Georg D
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 20888199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.