407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26756902)
1. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.
Nelson HD; O'Meara ES; Kerlikowske K; Balch S; Miglioretti D
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 26756902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
Nelson HD; Pappas M; Cantor A; Griffin J; Daeges M; Humphrey L
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):256-67. PubMed ID: 26756737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.
Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
Trentham-Dietz A; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Schechter CB; Ergun MA; van den Broek JJ; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; van Ravesteyn NT; Near AM; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Chandler Y; de Koning HJ; Mandelblatt JS; Tosteson AN;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 165(10):700-712. PubMed ID: 27548583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.
Ho TH; Bissell MCS; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA; Sprague BL; Lee CI; Tice JA; Tosteson ANA; Miglioretti DL
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e222440. PubMed ID: 35333365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors Associated with False Positive Results on Screening Mammography in a Population of Predominantly Hispanic Women.
McGuinness JE; Ueng W; Trivedi MS; Yi HS; David R; Vanegas A; Vargas J; Sandoval R; Kukafka R; Crew KD
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Apr; 27(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 29382701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.
Hubbard RA; Kerlikowske K; Flowers CI; Yankaskas BC; Zhu W; Miglioretti DL
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):481-92. PubMed ID: 22007042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
Siu AL;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):279-96. PubMed ID: 26757170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening in 75 + Women to Inform Shared Decision-making: a Simulation Modeling Study.
Jayasekera J; Stein S; Wilson OWA; Wojcik KM; Kamil D; Røssell EL; Abraham LA; O'Meara ES; Schoenborn NL; Schechter CB; Mandelblatt JS; Schonberg MA; Stout NK
J Gen Intern Med; 2024 Feb; 39(3):428-439. PubMed ID: 38010458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Su YR; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; Alsheik N; Bissell MCS; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL
JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(22):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 35699706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(3):1-55. PubMed ID: 23074406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; Geller B; Dittus K; Braithwaite D; Wernli KJ; Miglioretti DL; O'Meara ES;
JAMA Intern Med; 2013 May; 173(9):807-16. PubMed ID: 23552817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.
Glechner A; Wagner G; Mitus JW; Teufer B; Klerings I; Böck N; Grillich L; Berzaczy D; Helbich TH; Gartlehner G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 3(3):CD009632. PubMed ID: 36999589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
