These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26757414)

  • 1. Attention-dependent sound offset-related brain potentials.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):663-77. PubMed ID: 26757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sound offset-related brain potentials show retained sensory processing, but increased cognitive control activity in older adults.
    Horváth J; Gaál ZA; Volosin M
    Neurobiol Aging; 2017 Sep; 57():232-246. PubMed ID: 28666708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task difficulty modulates voluntary attention allocation, but not distraction in an auditory distraction paradigm.
    Volosin M; Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2020 Jan; 1727():146565. PubMed ID: 31765629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probing the sensory effects of involuntary attention change by ERPs to auditory transients.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2014 May; 51(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 24611948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multitasking: Effects of processing multiple auditory feature patterns.
    Miller T; Chen S; Lee WW; Sussman ES
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1140-8. PubMed ID: 25939456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 23316925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The nature of selective attention effects on auditory event-related potentials.
    Michie PT; Bearpark HM; Crawford JM; Glue LC
    Biol Psychol; 1990 Jun; 30(3):219-50. PubMed ID: 2282370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No evidence for peripheral mechanism attenuating auditory ERPs to self-induced tones.
    Horváth J; Burgyán A
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Jun; 50(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 23551061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones.
    Woldorff MG; Hillyard SA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Sep; 79(3):170-91. PubMed ID: 1714809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?
    Horváth J
    Psychol Res; 2014; 78(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 23913121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discontinuity of early and late event-related brain potentials for selective attention in dichotic listening.
    Ikeda K
    Neuroreport; 2018 Apr; 29(6):495-503. PubMed ID: 29538097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of the short-term learned significance of task-irrelevant sounds on involuntary attention in children and adults.
    Wetzel N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Oct; 98(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26093029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploiting temporal predictability: Event-related potential correlates of task-supportive temporal cue processing in auditory distraction.
    Volosin M; Grimm S; Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():120-31. PubMed ID: 26947619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responses of human auditory association cortex to the omission of an expected acoustic event.
    Hughes HC; Darcey TM; Barkan HI; Williamson PD; Roberts DW; Aslin CH
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jun; 13(6 Pt 1):1073-89. PubMed ID: 11352613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.