These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26759587)

  • 1. Volume fraction and location of voids and gaps in ultraconservative restorations by X-ray computed micro-tomography.
    Lagouvardos P; Nikolinakos N; Oulis C
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(6):520-7. PubMed ID: 26759587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo vs in vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2002 Dec; 18(8):561-9. PubMed ID: 12385896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of access cavity design on gaps and void formation in resin composite restorations following root canal treatment on extracted teeth.
    Silva EJNL; Oliveira VB; Silva AA; Belladonna FG; Prado M; Antunes HS; De-Deus G
    Int Endod J; 2020 Nov; 53(11):1540-1548. PubMed ID: 32749715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of a liner under different bulk-fill resin composites: 3D GAP formation analysis by x-ray microcomputed tomography.
    Oglakci B; Kazak M; Donmez N; Dalkilic EE; Koymen SS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190042. PubMed ID: 31778443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro marginal adaptation of high-viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities.
    Rahiotis C; Tzoutzas J; Kakaboura A
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15119587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.
    Gaintantzopoulou MD; Gopinath VK; Zinelis S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 27165307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. X-ray microtomography analysis of gaps and voids in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions with different composite resins.
    da Costa Vieira LCG; Campos AR; Senna PM; Reis Perez CD
    Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(1):85-89. PubMed ID: 35946251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
    Bansal D; Mahajan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Boroujeni PM; Mousavinasab SM; Hasanli E
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 May; 6(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24415719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations with self-adhesive composite resin liners.
    Doozandeh M; Shafiei F; Mohammadi F
    Gen Dent; 2017; 65(4):41-47. PubMed ID: 28682281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-destructive characterization of voids in six flowable composites using swept-source optical coherence tomography.
    Nazari A; Sadr A; Saghiri MA; Campillo-Funollet M; Hamba H; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    Dent Mater; 2013 Mar; 29(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 23182792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive Class I resin composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Peters TC; Burgersdijk RC; Teunis M
    Dent Mater; 1996 Jul; 12(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9002840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage around glass-ceramic insert restorations luted with a high-viscous or flowable composite.
    Salim S; Santini A; Safar KN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(1):30-8; discussion 39. PubMed ID: 15934683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of spherical silica additions on marginal gaps and compressive strength of experimental glass-ionomer cements.
    Irie M; Nagaoka N; Tamada Y; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Minagi S; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2011 Oct; 24(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 22165460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Liu JK; Chang CH; Shieh DB
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15195731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.