These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26759595)

  • 21. Esthetic Rehabilitation of Primary Anterior Teeth using Temporization Material: A Novel Approach.
    Gugnani N; Pandit IK; Gupta M; Nagpal J
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 10(1):111-114. PubMed ID: 28377667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria.
    Bektas Donmez S; Uysal S; Dolgun A; Turgut MD
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):202-212. PubMed ID: 27759409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Colorimetric values of esthetic stainless steel crowns.
    Hosoya Y; Omachi K; Staninec M
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):537-41. PubMed ID: 12165990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Restoring crown fractures by direct composite layering using transparent strip crowns.
    Eden E; Taviloğlu E
    Dent Traumatol; 2016 Apr; 32(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 26450763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An esthetic technique for veneering anterior stainless steel crowns with composite resin.
    Wiedenfeld KR; Draughn RA; Welford JB
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(5-6):321-6. PubMed ID: 7896998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
    Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In Vitro Assessment of Retention and Resistance Failure Loads of Teeth Restored with a Complete Coverage Restoration and Different Core Materials.
    Tsiagali V; Kirmanidou Y; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e229-e236. PubMed ID: 29143388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Periapical health related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings.
    Hommez GM; Coppens CR; De Moor RJ
    Int Endod J; 2002 Aug; 35(8):680-9. PubMed ID: 12196221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. I. Esthetic qualities.
    Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Feb; 1(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 9552812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of the fiber post and direct composite resin restoration for fixed single crowns on endodontically treated teeth.
    Murali Mohan S; Mahesh Gowda E; Shashidhar MP
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2015 Jul; 71(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 26288494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The method of esthetic crown restoration with composite resin jacket crown in primary molars].
    Doi K; Shibui N; Suda M; Uehara M; Karibe H; Kondou K
    Shigaku; 1990 Oct; 78(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 2134806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Prospective Six-Year Clinical Study Evaluating Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements with Resin Coating on Posterior Teeth: Quo Vadis?
    Türkün LS; Kanik Ö
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(6):587-598. PubMed ID: 27571238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical Performance of Indirect Composite Onlays as Esthetic Alternative to Stainless Steel Crowns for Rehabilitation of a Large Carious Primary Molar.
    Mittal HC; Goyal A; Gauba K; Kapur A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(5):345-52. PubMed ID: 27617373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.