These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26761515)

  • 1. Applying to Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Programs: Trends in the Past 5 Years of the Match.
    Tadisina KK; Orra S; Bassiri Gharb B; Kwiecien G; Bernard S; Zins JE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 26761515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Away Rotations and Matching in Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: Applicant and Program Director Perspectives.
    Drolet BC; Brower JP; Lifchez SD; Janis JE; Liu PY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 27018690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Updated View of the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.
    Borsting EA; Chim JH; Thaller SR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26418789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent trends in applicants and the matching process for the integrated plastic surgery match.
    Super N; Tieman J; Boucher K; Rockwell WB; Agarwal JP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 23407248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match.
    Wood JS; David LR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 64(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 20489406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unveiling the Need to Improve Personalized Applicant Tools: A Critical Evaluation of the Reliability of the Texas STAR database in Predicting Match Success for Plastic Surgery Applicants.
    Ewing JN; Gala Z; Lemdani MS; Crystal D; Broach RB; Azoury SC
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Sep; 81(9):1320-1330. PubMed ID: 39034224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Closer Look at the 2013 to 2014 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.
    Kling RE; Kling RR; Agi C; Toirac A; Manders EK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):624e-629e. PubMed ID: 26910706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of Plastic Surgery Applicant Success: An Analysis of the Texas STAR Database.
    Hallman TG; Qureshi U; Soltani H; Gutowski KS; Arcelona C; Donaldson R; Mihalic AP; Gosain AK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 35(4):1084-1088. PubMed ID: 38709027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrated plastic surgery residency applicant survey: characteristics of successful applicants and feedback about the interview process.
    Rogers CR; Gutowski KA; Rio AM; Larson DL; Edwards M; Hansen JE; Lawrence WT; Stevenson TR; Bentz ML
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 May; 123(5):1607-1617. PubMed ID: 19407635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Matched and Unmatched Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants from 2006 to 2014: Data from the National Resident Matching Program.
    Schrock JB; Kraeutler MJ; Dayton MR; McCarty EC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jan; 99(1):e1. PubMed ID: 28060237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in the 10-year history of the vascular integrated residency match: More work, higher cost, same result.
    McMackin KK; Caputo FJ; Hoell NG; Trani J; Carpenter JP; Lombardi JV
    J Vasc Surg; 2020 Jul; 72(1):298-303. PubMed ID: 32037082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Applicant Trends and Comparison With Other Surgical Specialties.
    Abraham JT; Nguyen AV; Weber RA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Feb; 80(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 28906299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2010-2018): Applicant and Program Trends, Predictors of a Successful Match, and Future Directions.
    Azoury SC; Kozak GM; Stranix JT; Colen DL; Piwnica-Worms W; Fosnot J; Serletti JM; Kovach SJ
    J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(1):219-228. PubMed ID: 31405800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Association between Away Rotations and Rank Order in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.
    Sergesketter AR; Glener AD; Shammas RL; Nguyen VT; Ko JH; Lifchez SD; Momoh AO; Marcus JR; Hollenbeck ST; Phillips BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 147(6):1050e-1056e. PubMed ID: 33973940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The "Independent" Plastic Surgery Match: Analysis of Changes in Recent Years and Applicant Preferences.
    Hammoudeh ZS; Mostafa G; Saint-Cyr M; Bakri K; Mardini S
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27886967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making a match: trends in the application, interview, and ranking process for the neurological surgery residency programs.
    Yaeger KA; Schupper AJ; Gilligan JT; Germano IM
    J Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 135(6):1882-1888. PubMed ID: 34049279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geographic Trends in the Plastic Surgery Match.
    Silvestre J; Lin IC; Serletti JM; Chang B
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 26774936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Solving Congestion in the Plastic Surgery Match: A Game Theory Analysis.
    Molina Burbano F; Yao A; Burish N; Ingargiola M; Freeman M; Stock J; Taub PJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Feb; 143(2):634-639. PubMed ID: 30531629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection criteria for the integrated model of plastic surgery residency.
    LaGrasso JR; Kennedy DA; Hoehn JG; Ashruf S; Przybyla AM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Mar; 121(3):121e-125e. PubMed ID: 18317094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical Assessment of the Contemporary Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process.
    Li NY; Gruppuso PA; Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Nov; 101(21):e114. PubMed ID: 31567662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.