135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26763216)
21. Chimpanzees and bonobos exhibit divergent spatial memory development.
Rosati AG; Hare B
Dev Sci; 2012 Nov; 15(6):840-53. PubMed ID: 23106738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Strategies used to combine seriated cups by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and capuchins (Cebus apella).
Johnson-Pynn J; Fragaszy DM; Hirsh EM; Brakke KE; Greenfield PM
J Comp Psychol; 1999 Jun; 113(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 10384722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.
Pelé M; Dufour V; Thierry B; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 19929106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Warlike chimpanzees and peacemaking bonobos.
Pusey AE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(31):e2208865119. PubMed ID: 35881798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Spontaneous classification in action by a human-enculturated and language-reared bonobo (Pan paniscus) and common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Spinozzi G; Langer J
J Comp Psychol; 1999 Sep; 113(3):286-96. PubMed ID: 10497794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of environment on the comprehension of declarative communication in apes.
Lyn H; Russell JL; Hopkins WD
Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):360-5. PubMed ID: 20424069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.
Uher J; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 18489236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the tool use behavior of the bonobo-chimpanzee last common ancestor, and the origins of hominine stone tool use.
Haslam M
Am J Primatol; 2014 Oct; 76(10):910-8. PubMed ID: 24710771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Differences in between-reinforcer value modulate the selective-value effect in great apes (Pan troglodytes, P. Paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii).
Sánchez-Amaro A; Peretó M; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2016 Feb; 130(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 26460854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative social grooming networks in captive chimpanzees and bonobos.
Rodrigues MA; Boeving ER
Primates; 2019 May; 60(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 29931656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility.
Vlamings PH; Uher J; Call J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jan; 32(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 16435965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A competitive nonverbal false belief task for children and apes.
Krachun C; Carpenter M; Call J; Tomasello M
Dev Sci; 2009 Jul; 12(4):521-35. PubMed ID: 19635080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The right time to happen: play developmental divergence in the two Pan species.
Palagi E; Cordoni G
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52767. PubMed ID: 23300765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The limits of endowment effects in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus).
Kanngiesser P; Santos LR; Hood BM; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2011 Nov; 125(4):436-45. PubMed ID: 21767009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Comparison Between Bonobos and Chimpanzees: A Review and Update.
Gruber T; Clay Z
Evol Anthropol; 2016 Sep; 25(5):239-252. PubMed ID: 27753219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of behavioral sequence of copulation between chimpanzees and bonobos.
Hashimoto C; Furuichi T
Primates; 2006 Jan; 47(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 16167095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The perception of causality in chimpanzees (Pan spp.).
O'Connell S; Dunbar RI
Anim Cogn; 2005 Jan; 8(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 15322943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Attractiveness of female sexual signaling predicts differences in female grouping patterns between bonobos and chimpanzees.
Surbeck M; Girard-Buttoz C; Samuni L; Boesch C; Fruth B; Crockford C; Wittig RM; Hohmann G
Commun Biol; 2021 Sep; 4(1):1119. PubMed ID: 34556787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Piagetian conservation of discrete quantities in bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).
Suda C; Call J
Anim Cogn; 2005 Oct; 8(4):220-35. PubMed ID: 15692813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Apes communicate about absent and displaced objects: methodology matters.
Lyn H; Russell JL; Leavens DA; Bard KA; Boysen ST; Schaeffer JA; Hopkins WD
Anim Cogn; 2014 Jan; 17(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23681052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
