BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26765079)

  • 1. Forage yields and feeding value of small grain winter cereals for lambs.
    Keles G; Ates S; Coskun B; Alatas MS; Isik S
    J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Sep; 96(12):4168-77. PubMed ID: 26765079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomass yield and feeding value of rye, triticale, and wheat straw produced under a dual-purpose management system.
    Ates S; Keles G; Demirci U; Dogan S; Ben Salem H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):4893-4903. PubMed ID: 29293703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fall growth, nutritive value, and estimation of total digestible nutrients for cereal-grain forages in the north-central United States.
    Coblentz WK; Walgenbach RP
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):383-99. PubMed ID: 19749014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of growth stage and growing degree day accumulations on triticale forages: 1. Dry matter yield, nutritive value, and in vitro dry matter disappearance.
    Coblentz WK; Akins MS; Kalscheur KF; Brink GE; Cavadini JS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):8965-8985. PubMed ID: 30031578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In situ disappearance of dry matter and fiber from fall-grown cereal-grain forages from the north-central United States.
    Coblentz WK; Walgenbach RP
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Dec; 88(12):3992-4005. PubMed ID: 20709871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cell wall chemical characteristics of whole-crop cereal silages harvested at three maturity stages.
    Wallsten J; Hatfield R
    J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Aug; 96(10):3604-12. PubMed ID: 27029834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of silage from maize crops differing in maturity at harvest, grass silage feed value and concentrate feed level on performance of finishing lambs.
    Keady TW; Hanrahan JP
    Animal; 2013 Jul; 7(7):1088-98. PubMed ID: 23425683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of ensiling cereal grains (barley, wheat, triticale and rye) on total and pre-caecal digestibility of proximate nutrients and amino acids in pigs.
    Hackl W; Pieper B; Pieper R; Korn U; Zeyner A
    J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2010 Dec; 94(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 20666865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of harvest date and growth stage on triticale forages in the southwest United States: agronomic characteristics, nutritive value, energy density, and in vitro disappearance of dry matter and fiber.
    Coblentz WK; Ottman MJ; Kieke BA
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Mar; 100(3):. PubMed ID: 35137106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of wheat forage maturity and preservation method on forage chemical composition and performance of growing calves fed mixed diets.
    Beck PA; Stewart CB; Gray HC; Smith JL; Gunter SA
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Dec; 87(12):4133-42. PubMed ID: 19717767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative digestibility of energy and nutrients and fermentability of dietary fiber in eight cereal grains fed to pigs.
    Cervantes-Pahm SK; Liu Y; Stein HH
    J Sci Food Agric; 2014 Mar; 94(5):841-9. PubMed ID: 23893839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic variations in the digestibility in sheep of selected whole-crop cereals used as silages.
    Emile JC; Jobim CC; Surault F; Barrière Y
    Animal; 2007 Sep; 1(8):1122-5. PubMed ID: 22444857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of whole crop cereal grain silage substituted for alfalfa silage on performance of lactating dairy cows.
    Khorasani GR; Okine EK; Kennelly JJ; Helm JH
    J Dairy Sci; 1993 Nov; 76(11):3536-46. PubMed ID: 8270696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in chemical composition and physical characteristics of cereal grains from different genotypes.
    Rodehutscord M; Rückert C; Maurer HP; Schenkel H; Schipprack W; Bach Knudsen KE; Schollenberger M; Laux M; Eklund M; Siegert W; Mosenthin R
    Arch Anim Nutr; 2016; 70(2):87-107. PubMed ID: 26829392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of mechanical processing on the nutritive value of barley silage for lactating dairy cows.
    Eun JS; Beauchemin KA; Hong SH; Yang WZ
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Dec; 87(12):4170-7. PubMed ID: 15545379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In situ and in vitro evaluation of crude protein degradation and utilisable crude protein content of barley, rye and triticale grains for ruminants.
    Krieg J; Seifried N; Steingass H; Rodehutscord M
    J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2018 Apr; 102(2):452-461. PubMed ID: 28984063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of grass forage species and long-term period of low quality forage diet feeding on growth performance, nutrient utilization and microbial nitrogen yield in growing wether lambs.
    Kim DH; Choi KC; Song SH; Ichinohe T
    Anim Sci J; 2016 Feb; 87(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 26278910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feed preference in pigs: effect of cereal sources at different inclusion rates.
    Solà-Oriol D; Roura E; Torrallardona D
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Feb; 87(2):562-70. PubMed ID: 18952740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of wheat chemical and physical characteristics and nutritive value by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy.
    Owens B; McCann ME; McCracken KJ; Park RS
    Br Poult Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):103-22. PubMed ID: 19234935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in potential feeding value of triticale forage among plant fraction, maturity stage, growing season and genotype.
    De Zutter A; Landschoot S; Vermeir P; Van Waes C; Muylle H; Roldán-Ruiz I; Douidah L; De Boever J; Haesaert G
    Heliyon; 2023 Jan; 9(1):e12760. PubMed ID: 36685447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.