These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26765948)

  • 1. From Positivity to Negativity Bias: Ambiguity Affects the Neurophysiological Signatures of Feedback Processing.
    Gibbons H; Schnuerch R; Stahl J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 26765948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valence-separated representation of reward prediction error in feedback-related negativity and positivity.
    Bai Y; Katahira K; Ohira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Feb; 26(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 25634316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduced sensitivity to neutral feedback versus negative feedback in subjects with mild depression: Evidence from event-related potentials study.
    Li P; Song X; Wang J; Zhou X; Li J; Lin F; Hu Z; Zhang X; Cui H; Wang W; Li H; Cong F; Roberson D
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Nov; 100():15-20. PubMed ID: 26432379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feedback-related negativity codes outcome valence, but not outcome expectancy, during reversal learning.
    von Borries AK; Verkes RJ; Bulten BH; Cools R; de Bruijn ER
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 13(4):737-46. PubMed ID: 24146314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning.
    Martínez-Velázquez ES; Ramos-Loyo J; González-Garrido AA; Sequeira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Jan; 26(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 25494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feedback-related negativity reflects omission of monetary gains: Evidence from ERP gambling study.
    Yaple Z; Shestakova A; Klucharev V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Nov; 686():145-149. PubMed ID: 30195974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Neurophysiological examination of quality of learning in a feedback-based learning task.
    Arbel Y; Wu H
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):13-20. PubMed ID: 27713069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mock B; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):521-39. PubMed ID: 17936313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bringing in the negative reinforcements: the avoidance feedback-related negativity.
    Crowley MJ; Wu J; Bailey CA; Mayes LC
    Neuroreport; 2009 Nov; 20(17):1513-7. PubMed ID: 19829164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To choose or to avoid: age differences in learning from positive and negative feedback.
    Eppinger B; Kray J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 19925176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Music-induced mood modulates the strength of emotional negativity bias: an ERP study.
    Chen J; Yuan J; Huang H; Chen C; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 445(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 18771704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task.
    Becker MP; Nitsch AM; Miltner WH; Straube T
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(8):3005-12. PubMed ID: 24553940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Valence and magnitude ambiguity in feedback processing.
    Gu R; Feng X; Broster LS; Yuan L; Xu P; Luo YJ
    Brain Behav; 2017 May; 7(5):e00672. PubMed ID: 28523218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of reward magnitude on reward processing: An averaged and single trial event-related potential study.
    Meadows CC; Gable PA; Lohse KR; Miller MW
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jul; 118():154-160. PubMed ID: 27288743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feedback-related brain potential activity complies with basic assumptions of associative learning theory.
    Luque D; López FJ; Marco-Pallares J; Càmara E; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):794-808. PubMed ID: 21981667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feedback delay impaired reinforcement learning: Principal components analysis of Reward Positivity.
    Yin H; Wang Y; Zhang X; Li P
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Oct; 685():179-184. PubMed ID: 30170042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of task complexity and information value on feedback processing in younger and older adults: No evidence for a positivity bias during feedback-induced learning in older adults.
    Ferdinand NK
    Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 1717():74-85. PubMed ID: 30991040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the relationship between learning strategy and feedback processing in the weather prediction task--Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Rustemeier M; Schwabe L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 23347964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.