These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26765993)

  • 1. Variations in voice level and fundamental frequency with changing background noise level and talker-to-listener distance while wearing hearing protectors: A pilot study.
    Bouserhal RE; Macdonald EN; Falk TH; Voix J
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 26765993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling Speech Level as a Function of Background Noise Level and Talker-to-Listener Distance for Talkers Wearing Hearing Protection Devices.
    Bouserhal RE; Bockstael A; MacDonald E; Falk TH; Voix J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3393-3403. PubMed ID: 29204606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of hearing protection worn by talker and/or target listener on speech production in quiet and noise.
    Vaziri G; Giguère C; Dajani HR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1528. PubMed ID: 36182271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments.
    Pelegrín-García D; Smits B; Brunskog J; Jeong CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):1981-90. PubMed ID: 21476654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech understanding in noise with integrated in-ear and muff-style hearing protection systems.
    Abel SM; Nakashima A; Saunders D
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(55):378-84. PubMed ID: 22122953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech production in noise with and without hearing protection.
    Tufts JB; Frank T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):1069-80. PubMed ID: 12942985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To measure the impact of hearing protectors on the perception of speech in noise.
    Hiselius P; Edvall N; Reimers D
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 1():S3-8. PubMed ID: 25549165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech modifications in interactive speech: effects of age, sex and noise type.
    Tuomainen O; Taschenberger L; Rosen S; Hazan V
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Jan; 377(1841):20200398. PubMed ID: 34775827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic changes in the production of lexical stress during Lombard speech.
    Arciuli J; Simpson BS; Vogel AP; Ballard KJ
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):149-62. PubMed ID: 25102603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal detection and speech perception with level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Giguere C; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 2030537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of warble tones in wideband noise with and without hearing protection devices.
    Letowski T; McGee L
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1993 Dec; 37(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 8304681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise with active and passive hearing protectors: a comparative study.
    Bockstael A; De Coensel B; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Bart V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3702-15. PubMed ID: 21682395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Most comfortable loudness shift as a measure of speech attenuation by hearing protectors.
    Letowski T; Burstein N; Clark J; Romanowski L; Sevec A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Apr; 56(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 7726101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Training to Improve Spatial Hearing and Situation Awareness when Wearing Hearing Protection.
    Golob EJ; Nelson JT; Walasek JA; Piedra ET; Mock JR; Adams MJK; Esquivel CCR; Spear CSA
    Mil Med; 2024 Jan; 189(1-2):e306-e312. PubMed ID: 37715688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Work-related communicative profile of radio broadcasters: a case study.
    Cantor-Cutiva LC; Bottalico P; Hunter E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Dec; 44(4):178-191. PubMed ID: 30183443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15220495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Communication in noise with acoustic and electronic hearing protection devices.
    Plyler PN; Klumpp ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Jul; 14(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 12956309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.