These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26766027)

  • 1. Vascular response to everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents versus everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds--an optical coherence tomography substudy of the EVERBIO II trial.
    Kallinikou Z; Arroyo D; Togni M; Lehman S; Corpataux N; Cook M; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Puricel SG; Cook S
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2016; 146():w14274. PubMed ID: 26766027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
    Puricel S; Arroyo D; Corpataux N; Baeriswyl G; Lehmann S; Kallinikou Z; Muller O; Allard L; Stauffer JC; Togni M; Goy JJ; Cook S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 65(8):791-801. PubMed ID: 25720622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Two-year clinical outcomes of the EVERBIO II trial.
    Arroyo D; Gendre G; Schukraft S; Kallinikou Z; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Togni M; Cook S; Puricel S
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 243():121-125. PubMed ID: 28576627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: study protocol of the randomized controlled EVERBIO II trial.
    Arroyo D; Togni M; Puricel S; Gerard B; Sonja L; Corpataux N; Villeneuve H; Boute E; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Cook S
    Trials; 2014 Jan; 15():9. PubMed ID: 24398143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. STACCATO (Assessment of Stent sTrut Apposition and Coverage in Coronary ArTeries with Optical coherence tomography in patients with STEMI, NSTEMI and stable/unstable angina undergoing everolimus vs. biolimus A9-eluting stent implantation): a randomised controlled trial.
    Adriaenssens T; Ughi GJ; Dubois C; De Cock D; Onsea K; Bennett J; Wiyono S; Sinnaeve P; Coosemans M; Ferdinande B; Belmans A; D'hooge J; Desmet W
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Apr; 11(14):e1619-26. PubMed ID: 25420791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology).
    Wan Ahmad WA; Nakayoshi T; Mahmood Zuhdi AS; Ismail MD; Zainal Abidin I; Ino Y; Kubo T; Akasaka T; Fukumoto Y; Ueno T
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Apr; 35(4):463-473. PubMed ID: 31587103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fate of post-procedural malapposition of everolimus-eluting polymeric bioresorbable scaffold and everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium metallic stent in human coronary arteries: sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography in ABSORB Japan trial.
    Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Dijkstra J; Miyazaki Y; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Popma JJ; de Winter RJ; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 28158421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial.
    Onuma Y; Sotomi Y; Shiomi H; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Igarashi K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Simonton C; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(9):1090-1101. PubMed ID: 27597270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
    Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography.
    Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Diletti R; Windecker S; Thuesen L; McClean D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Dudek D; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Regar E; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 22192368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vascular response to drug-eluting stent with biodegradable vs. durable polymer. Optical coherence tomography substudy of the NEXT.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Kozuma K; Kimura K; Fusazaki T; Okura H; Shinke T; Ino Y; Hasegawa T; Takashima H; Takamisawa I; Yamaguchi H; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Nakagawa Y; Muramatsu T; Morino Y; Kimura T;
    Circ J; 2014; 78(10):2408-14. PubMed ID: 25099476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-year vascular responses to drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer: An optical coherence tomography sub-study of the NEXT.
    Katayama Y; Kubo T; Akasaka T; Ino Y; Kimura K; Okura H; Shinke T; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Nakagawa Y; Muramatsu T; Morino Y; Kimura T;
    J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(6):530-536. PubMed ID: 28536015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five-year angiographic, OCT and clinical outcomes of a randomized comparison of everolimus and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
    Schukraft S; Arroyo D; Togni M; Goy JJ; Wenaweser P; Stadelmann M; Baeriswyl G; Muller O; Stauffer JC; Puricel S; Cook S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):523-532. PubMed ID: 34173699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of neointimal coverage between everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography substudy of the RESET (Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial).
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Kozuma K; Kimura K; Kawamura M; Sumiyoshi T; Ino Y; Morino Y; Tanabe K; Kadota K; Kimura T;
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Sep; 11(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 26390517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome - the Activity of Platelets after Inhibition and Cardiovascular Events: Optical Coherence Tomography (APICE OCT) study.
    Chieffo A; Buchanan GL; Parodi G; Versaci F; Bianchi RM; Valenti R; Saccà S; Mongiardo A; Span S; Migliorini A; Spaccarotella C; Reimers B; Antoniucci D; Indolfi C; Ferrari A; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Colombo A
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Dec; 10(8):916-23. PubMed ID: 24974806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arterial healing following primary PCI using the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) versus the durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent (XIENCE) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the randomised TROFI II study.
    Räber L; Onuma Y; Brugaletta S; Garcia-Garcia HM; Backx B; Iñiguez A; Okkels Jensen L; Cequier-Fillat À; Pilgrim T; Christiansen EH; Hofma SH; Suttorp M; Serruys PW; Sabaté M; Windecker S
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Jul; 12(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 26342471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized comparison of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with permanent polymer coatings assessed by optical coherence tomography.
    Tada T; Kastrati A; Byrne RA; Schuster T; Cuni R; King LA; Cassese S; Joner M; Pache J; Massberg S; Schömig A; Mehilli J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 30(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 24452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent for vascular healing response: serial 3-month and 12-month optical coherence tomography study.
    Kim SJ; Lee H; Cho JM; Park CB; Kim W; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Kim CJ; Jang IK
    Coron Artery Dis; 2013 Aug; 24(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 23722649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.
    Buszman PP; Michalak MJ; Pruski M; Fernandez C; Jelonek M; Janas A; Savard C; Gwiazdowska-Nowotka B; Żurakowski A; Wojakowski W; Buszman PE; Milewski K
    Cardiol J; 2016; 23(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 27976797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of vascular responses after different types of second-generation drug-eluting stents implantation detected by optical coherence tomography.
    Ohtani H; Kimura S; Sugiyama T; Hishikari K; Misawa T; Mizusawa M; Hayasaka K; Yamakami Y; Kojima K; Sagawa Y; Hikita H; Ashikaga T; Takahashi A; Isobe M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):177-186. PubMed ID: 27761750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.