These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Previous open renal surgery increased vascular complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared with primary and secondary PCNL and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients: a retrospective study. Yesil S; Ozturk U; Goktug HN; Tuygun C; Nalbant I; Imamoglu MA Urol Int; 2013; 91(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 23867857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Comparison of Cyberwand dual probe lithotriptor and Swiss lithoclast master in ultrasonically guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn calculi]. Li Y; Zeng F; Yang Z; Chen H Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Aug; 38(8):853-6. PubMed ID: 23981994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10-20 mm. Ozturk U; Sener NC; Goktug HN; Nalbant I; Gucuk A; Imamoglu MA Urol Int; 2013; 91(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 23816573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost effectiveness of electrohydraulic lithotripsy v Candela pulsed-dye laser in management of the distal ureteral stone. Huang S; Patel H; Bellman GC J Endourol; 1998 Jun; 12(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 9658293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Skin-to-stone distance has no impact on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Gonulalan U; Akand M; Coban G; Cicek T; Kosan M; Goktas S; Ozkardes H Urol Int; 2014; 92(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 24481206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Percutaneous nephrostomy, nephrolithotomy and combined ureteroscopic lithotripsy using the supine approach. Kan RW; Fu KK; Wong BT; Ho KL; Yiu MK Hong Kong Med J; 2013 Apr; 19(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 23535674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of nephrostomy drainage types following percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring multiple tracts: single tube versus multiple tubes versus tubeless. Resorlu B; Kara C; Sahin E; Unsal A Urol Int; 2011; 87(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 21720147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi with different stone branch number]. Qi SY; Zhang ZH; Zhang CW; Liu RL; Shi QD; Xu Y Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 51(12):1085-8. PubMed ID: 24499717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of un-hydronephrotic cata-staghorn renal calculi]. Gao N; Chen HQ; Qi L; Yang ZQ; Qi F; Zhang XY Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Aug; 32(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 17767074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi. Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of microperc in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi. Tepeler A; Armagan A; Sancaktutar AA; Silay MS; Penbegul N; Akman T; Hatipoglu NK; Ersoz C; Erdem MR; Akcay M J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 22873714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Large Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Saad KS; Youssif ME; Al Islam Nafis Hamdy S; Fahmy A; El Din Hanno AG; El-Nahas AR J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1716-20. PubMed ID: 26165587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost-effectiveness of different treatment options for staghorn calculi. Chandhoke PS J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1567-71. PubMed ID: 8863539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Kidney stone removal: percutaneous versus surgical lithotomy. Brannen GE; Bush WH; Correa RJ; Gibbons RP; Elder JS J Urol; 1985 Jan; 133(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 3917296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]