These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26767095)

  • 1. Effect of different gingival margin restorations of class II cavities on microleakage: an in-vitro study.
    Mahrous AI; Eltiti HA; Ahmed IM; Alagha EI
    Electron Physician; 2015 Nov; 7(7):1435-40. PubMed ID: 26767095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
    Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of fiber inserts, type of composite, and gingival margin location on the microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
    Dhingra V; Taneja S; Kumar M; Kumari M
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 23802641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of C-factor and LED Curing Mode on Microleakage of Class V Resin Composite Restorations.
    Alomari QD; Barrieshi-Nusair K; Ali M
    Eur J Dent; 2011 Aug; 5(4):400-8. PubMed ID: 21912498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
    Bansal D; Mahajan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study.
    Gyanani HC; Chhabra N; Shah NC; Jais PS
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):ZC70-3. PubMed ID: 27135006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites.
    Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):65-72. PubMed ID: 18997918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Microleakage of Class V Cavities restored with the Embrace WetBond Class V Composite Resin and Conventional Opallis Composite Resin.
    Tavangar M; Zohri Z; Sheikhnezhad H; Shahbeig S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):867-873. PubMed ID: 28989122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the influence of three different temperatures on microleakage of two self-etch and one total-etch adhesives.
    Akbarian S; Sharafeddin F; Akbarian G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 16(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 26057914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.