BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26768112)

  • 1. The effects of subsampling gene trees on coalescent methods applied to ancient divergences.
    Simmons MP; Sloan DB; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Apr; 97():76-89. PubMed ID: 26768112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of congruence among gene trees with polytomies using overall success of resolution for phylogenomic coalescent analyses.
    Simmons MP; Goloboff PA; Stöver BC; Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Cladistics; 2023 Oct; 39(5):418-436. PubMed ID: 37096985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coalescence vs. concatenation: Sophisticated analyses vs. first principles applied to rooting the angiosperms.
    Simmons MP; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Oct; 91():98-122. PubMed ID: 26002829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whole-Genome Analyses Resolve the Phylogeny of Flightless Birds (Palaeognathae) in the Presence of an Empirical Anomaly Zone.
    Cloutier A; Sackton TB; Grayson P; Clamp M; Baker AJ; Edwards SV
    Syst Biol; 2019 Nov; 68(6):937-955. PubMed ID: 31135914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene-tree misrooting drives conflicts in phylogenomic coalescent analyses of palaeognath birds.
    Simmons MP; Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2022 Feb; 167():107344. PubMed ID: 34748873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing species tree estimation with large anchored phylogenomic and small Sanger-sequenced molecular datasets: an empirical study on Malagasy pseudoxyrhophiine snakes.
    Ruane S; Raxworthy CJ; Lemmon AR; Lemmon EM; Burbrink FT
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Oct; 15():221. PubMed ID: 26459325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gene-wise resampling outperforms site-wise resampling in phylogenetic coalescence analyses.
    Simmons MP; Sloan DB; Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 Feb; 131():80-92. PubMed ID: 30391518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for Uncertainty in Gene Tree Estimation: Summary-Coalescent Species Tree Inference in a Challenging Radiation of Australian Lizards.
    Blom MPK; Bragg JG; Potter S; Moritz C
    Syst Biol; 2017 May; 66(3):352-366. PubMed ID: 28039387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To Include or Not to Include: The Impact of Gene Filtering on Species Tree Estimation Methods.
    Molloy EK; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):285-303. PubMed ID: 29029338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model.
    Liu L; Yu L; Edwards SV
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Oct; 10():302. PubMed ID: 20937096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expected pairwise congruence among gene trees under the coalescent model.
    Tian Y; Kubatko LS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Jan; 106():144-150. PubMed ID: 27693467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collapsing dubiously resolved gene-tree branches in phylogenomic coalescent analyses.
    Simmons MP; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2021 May; 158():107092. PubMed ID: 33545272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Robustness to Gene Tree Estimation Error (or lack thereof) of Coalescent-Based Species Tree Methods.
    Roch S; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2015 Jul; 64(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 25813358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genes with minimal phylogenetic information are problematic for coalescent analyses when gene tree estimation is biased.
    Xi Z; Liu L; Davis CC
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Nov; 92():63-71. PubMed ID: 26115844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree.
    Mirarab S; Bayzid MS; Boussau B; Warnow T
    Science; 2014 Dec; 346(6215):1250463. PubMed ID: 25504728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of SVDquartets and other coalescent-based species tree estimation methods.
    Chou J; Gupta A; Yaduvanshi S; Davidson R; Nute M; Mirarab S; Warnow T
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S2. PubMed ID: 26449249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. STELAR: a statistically consistent coalescent-based species tree estimation method by maximizing triplet consistency.
    Islam M; Sarker K; Das T; Reaz R; Bayzid MS
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 32039704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
    Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gene Tree Estimation Error with Ultraconserved Elements: An Empirical Study on Pseudapis Bees.
    Bossert S; Murray EA; Pauly A; Chernyshov K; Brady SG; Danforth BN
    Syst Biol; 2021 Jun; 70(4):803-821. PubMed ID: 33367855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.