These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26768140)

  • 1. Reproductive outcome is optimized by genomic embryo screening, vitrification, and subsequent transfer into a prepared synchronous endometrium.
    Rodriguez-Purata J; Lee J; Whitehouse M; Duke M; Grunfeld L; Sandler B; Copperman A; Mukherjee T
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar; 33(3):401-412. PubMed ID: 26768140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hatching status before embryo transfer is not correlated with implantation rate in chromosomally screened blastocysts.
    Rodriguez-Purata J; Gingold J; Lee J; Whitehouse M; Slifkin R; Briton-Jones C; Copperman A; Sandler B
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 27619770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers.
    An BGL; Chapman M; Tilia L; Venetis C
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2797-2807. PubMed ID: 36305795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High FSH dosing is associated with reduced live birth rate in fresh but not subsequent frozen embryo transfers.
    Munch EM; Sparks AE; Zimmerman MB; Van Voorhis BJ; Duran EH
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1402-1409. PubMed ID: 28472321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
    Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Slifkin R; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Flisser E
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?
    Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reproductive potential of vitrified-warmed euploid embryos declines following repeated uterine transfers.
    Almohammadi A; Choucair F; El Taha L; Burjaq H; Albader M; Cavanillas AB; Awwad JT
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2024 Feb; 22(1):23. PubMed ID: 38350949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes at blastocyst stage according to freezing method and type of endometrial preparation].
    Pouget O; Scalici E; Hoa-Ferrieres A; Deutsch-Bringer S; Gala A; Dechaud H; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 25708846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial.
    Coates A; Kung A; Mounts E; Hesla J; Bankowski B; Barbieri E; Ata B; Cohen J; Munné S
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):723-730.e3. PubMed ID: 28139240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Replacing single frozen-thawed euploid embryos in a natural cycle in ovulatory women may increase live birth rates compared to medicated cycles in anovulatory women.
    Melnick AP; Setton R; Stone LD; Pereira N; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z; Spandorfer SD
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1325-1331. PubMed ID: 28647784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.
    Singh S; Hobeika E; Knochenhauer ES; Traub ML
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Apr; 36(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 30645703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.
    Glujovsky D; Pesce R; Sueldo C; Quinteiro Retamar AM; Hart RJ; Ciapponi A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Oct; 10(10):CD006359. PubMed ID: 33112418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
    Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in pregnancy outcomes in donor egg frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): a single center retrospective study.
    Coates A; Bankowski BJ; Kung A; Griffin DK; Munne S
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Jan; 34(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 27853913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initial maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies achieved after assisted reproductive technology are higher after preimplantation genetic screening and after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort.
    Hobeika E; Singh S; Malik S; Knochenhauer ES; Traub ML
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1333-1340. PubMed ID: 28639180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate versus postponed frozen embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bergenheim SJ; Saupstad M; Pistoljevic N; Andersen AN; Forman JL; Løssl K; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2021 Jun; 27(4):623-642. PubMed ID: 33594441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cimadomo D; Rienzi L; Conforti A; Forman E; Canosa S; Innocenti F; Poli M; Hynes J; Gemmell L; Vaiarelli A; Alviggi C; Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2023 Sep; 29(5):570-633. PubMed ID: 37192834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer.
    Ding X; Yang J; Li L; Yang N; Lan L; Huang G; Ye H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):207. PubMed ID: 33711956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmentally delayed cleavage-stage embryos maintain comparable implantation rates in frozen embryo transfers.
    Burks H; Buckbinder J; Francis-Hernandez M; Chung K; Jabara S; Bendikson K; Paulson R
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Oct; 32(10):1477-81. PubMed ID: 26347340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?
    Bassil R; Casper R; Samara N; Hsieh TB; Barzilay E; Orvieto R; Haas J
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jul; 35(7):1301-1305. PubMed ID: 29737471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.