109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2676829)
1. Access loss forces Medicaid strategy evaluation.
Larkin H
Hospitals; 1989 Oct; 63(20):22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 2676829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. California selective provider contracting program: two-tier medicine here we come, right back where we started from.
Liset JR
Health Law Vigil; 1983 May; 6(10):suppl 4-6. PubMed ID: 10298924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medi-Cal contracting: model or mayhem?
Friedman E
Hospitals; 1984 Aug; 58(15):74-8. PubMed ID: 6376328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective contracting in California: an update.
Johns L
Inquiry; 1989; 26(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 2529212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Competition: California takes the lead.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1982 Sep; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 10298675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Provider participation in competitive bidding for indigent patients.
Christianson JB
Inquiry; 1984; 21(2):161-77. PubMed ID: 6237997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Progress report on hospital cost control in California. More regulation than competition.
Petersdorf RG
N Engl J Med; 1983 Jul; 309(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 6346095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Illinois follows California's example with contracts; other states mull plan.
Wallace C
Mod Healthc; 1985 Apr; 15(9):40. PubMed ID: 10300143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How to negotiate a Medi-Cal inpatient contract.
DeMuro PR
Calif Hosp; 1991; 5(5):29-30. PubMed ID: 10113778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The post Medi-Cal blues.
Cumming DS
Calif Hosp; 1991; 5(5):37, 48-50. PubMed ID: 10113781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medi-Cal-fostered competition seen as control on costs, incentive to increase hospital efficiency.
Lipschultz C
Health Law Vigil; 1983 May; 6(10):suppl 1-3. PubMed ID: 10298923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How to prepare data for Medi-Cal negotiation.
Foley JC
Calif Hosp; 1991; 5(5):32-4. PubMed ID: 10113779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Selective contracting in California: experience in the second year.
Johns L; Anderson MD; Derzon RA
Inquiry; 1985; 22(4):335-47. PubMed ID: 2934329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When 'preferred' becomes 'exclusive'.
Gibbons DL; Ismach JM
Med World News; 1983 Feb; 24(4):65-6. PubMed ID: 10299163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How the poor fared in a competitive model: assessing the Illinois selective contracting approach.
Christoffel T; Snelling P
J Public Health Policy; 1988; 9(4):519-36. PubMed ID: 3069870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Financial, operational issues entangle Medicaid managed care.
Kalkhof CJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1992 Aug; 46(8):26-8, 30, 32 passim. PubMed ID: 10145662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective contracting in California: early effects and policy implications.
Johns L; Derzon RA; Anderson MD
Inquiry; 1985; 22(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 2933330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding financial responsibility in managed care!
Cathon DE
J Oncol Manag; 1998; 7(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 10181578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New face at the bargaining table.
McCann RW; Tomaselli LA
Hospitals; 1983 Oct; 57(20):75-9. PubMed ID: 6352455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An empirical investigation of procurement contract structures.
Vistnes G
Rand J Econ; 1994; 25(2):215-41. PubMed ID: 10134649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
