171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26768543)
1. The Pitfalls of Rendering an Expert Opinion in Breast Malpractice Cases by Reviewing a CD-ROM.
Brenner RJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Apr; 13(4):424-5. PubMed ID: 26768543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Responding to an accusation of malpractice.
Gunderman RB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Mar; 7(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 20193921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lessons learned from reviewing breast imaging malpractice cases.
Arleo EK; Saleh M; Rosenblatt R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1186-8. PubMed ID: 24889476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Not Available].
Rofo; 2020 Mar; 192(3):283-286. PubMed ID: 32074644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography screening can survive malpractice ... if radiologists take center stage and assume the role of educator.
Berlin L
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):641-4. PubMed ID: 15564402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Missed mammographic abnormalities, malpractice, and expert witnesses: does majority rule in the courtroom?
Berlin L
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):288; author reply 289. PubMed ID: 14519882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the legal risk of a 'missed' cancer in two breastscreen services.
Osborne J; Lee W
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Feb; 54(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 20377711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography and malpractice litigation: current status, lessons, and admonitions.
Brenner RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 8273628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical malpractice and tort reform.
; Berry MD
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2014 Dec; ():1-40. PubMed ID: 25775714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Malpractice issues in radiology. American College of Radiology Standard for Communication.
Cascade PN; Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1439-42. PubMed ID: 10584778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Malpractice issues in radiology. When an expert witness is not an expert.
Berlin L; Williams DM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1215-9. PubMed ID: 10789765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic pitfall and diagnostic error from the malpractice viewpoint].
Ostendorf GM
Versicherungsmedizin; 2014 Jun; 66(2):102. PubMed ID: 25000634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Holding expert witnesses accountable for their actions and opinions.
Ramseyer L
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2004 Apr; 97(4):152. PubMed ID: 15141768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast imaging, standard of care, and the expert.
Homer MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):963-74, viii. PubMed ID: 15337428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 17715094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Not Available].
Thiede A; Zimmermann HJ
Zentralbl Chir; 2016 Oct; 141(5):501-502. PubMed ID: 27769092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [In process].
Thiede A; Zimmermann HJ
Zentralbl Chir; 2017 Apr; 142(2):152-153. PubMed ID: 28437831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Expert witness blinding strategies to mitigate bias in radiology malpractice cases: a comprehensive review of the literature.
Durand DJ; Robertson CT; Agarwal G; Duszak R; Krupinski EA; Itri JN; Fotenos A; Savoie B; Ding A; Lewin JS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):868-73. PubMed ID: 25041992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicolegal--Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Electronic health records and malpractice litigation: malpractice pitfalls.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W447-8. PubMed ID: 25247975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicolegal: malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Proofreading radiology reports.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W691-2. PubMed ID: 23701104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
