These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26769254)

  • 1. Subjectivity is a strength: a comment on "an algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews".
    Gionfriddo MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():237. PubMed ID: 26769254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews.
    Pollock A; Farmer SE; Brady MC; Langhorne P; Mead GE; Mehrholz J; van Wijck F; Wiffen PJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():106-10. PubMed ID: 26341023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Algorithm for Choosing the Study Design in Systematic Reviews].
    Peinemann F; Kleijnen J
    Klin Padiatr; 2016 Sep; 228(5):235-239. PubMed ID: 27485711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A practical algorithm for systematic reviews in cardiovascular medicine.
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Testa L; Agostoni P
    Ital Heart J; 2004 Jun; 5(6):486-7. PubMed ID: 15320578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grades for quality of evidence were associated with distinct likelihoods that treatment effects will remain stable.
    Gartlehner G; Sommer I; Evans TS; Thaler K; Lohr KN
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 25484316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mini-Sentinel's systematic reviews of validated methods for identifying health outcomes using administrative and claims data: methods and lessons learned.
    Carnahan RM; Moores KG
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Jan; 21 Suppl 1():82-9. PubMed ID: 22262596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mini-Sentinel's systematic reviews of validated methods for identifying health outcomes using administrative data: summary of findings and suggestions for future research.
    Carnahan RM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Jan; 21 Suppl 1():90-9. PubMed ID: 22262597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Searching ClinicalTrials.gov did not change the conclusions of a systematic review.
    Wilson LM; Sharma R; Dy SM; Waldfogel JM; Robinson KA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():127-135. PubMed ID: 28757261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to investigate and follow up undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis? 3e initiative 2008-2009: systematic reviews and clinical algorithm.
    Bombardier C; van der Heijde DM
    J Rheumatol Suppl; 2011 Mar; 87():1-2. PubMed ID: 21364048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where are the systematic reviews in transfusion medicine? A study of the transfusion evidence base.
    Dorée C; Stanworth S; Brunskill SJ; Hopewell S; Hyde CJ; Murphy MF
    Transfus Med Rev; 2010 Oct; 24(4):286-94. PubMed ID: 20851331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; Shojania KG; McGowan J; Daniel R; Rader T; Iansavichene AE; Ji J; Ansari MT; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):755-62. PubMed ID: 18586179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews do not comment on applicability for primary care.
    Missiou A; Tatsioni A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 68(10):1152-60. PubMed ID: 26093310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity.
    Seo HJ; Kim SY; Lee YJ; Jang BH; Park JE; Sheen SS; Hahn SK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():200-5. PubMed ID: 26408805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: a case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders.
    Weir MC; Grimshaw JM; Mayhew A; Fergusson D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):756-63. PubMed ID: 22498429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.
    Owens DK; Lohr KN; Atkins D; Treadwell JR; Reston JT; Bass EB; Chang S; Helfand M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 19595577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: tools and methods.
    Wallace BC; Dahabreh IJ; Schmid CH; Lau J; Trikalinos TA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 May; 2(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 24236626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interrater reliability of grading strength of evidence varies with the complexity of the evidence in systematic reviews.
    Berkman ND; Lohr KN; Morgan LC; Kuo TM; Morton SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1105-1117.e1. PubMed ID: 23993312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and risk of bias considerations.
    Xing D; Wang B; Zhang W; Yang Z; Hou Y; Chen Y; Lin J
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1612-1630. PubMed ID: 29210206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer.
    Créquit P; Trinquart L; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P
    BMC Med; 2016 Jan; 14():8. PubMed ID: 26792360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
    Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Apr; 35(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 22510325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.