These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26769293)
1. Imaging and Right Ventricular Pacing Lead Position: A Comparison of CT, MRI, and Echocardiography. Moore P; Coucher J; Ngai S; Stanton T; Wahi S; Gould P; Booth C; Pratap J; Kaye G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Apr; 39(4):382-92. PubMed ID: 26769293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of fluoroscopic and electrocardiographic criteria for pacemaker lead implantation by comparison with three-dimensional echocardiography. Mǎrgulescu AD; Suran BM; Rimbaş RC; Dulgheru RE; Silişte C; Vinereanu D J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jul; 25(7):796-803. PubMed ID: 22609097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of conventional fluoroscopic and ECG criteria for right ventricular pacemaker lead position using cardiac computed tomography. Pang BJ; Joshi SB; Lui EH; Tacey MA; Ling LH; Alison J; Seneviratne SK; Cameron JD; Mond HG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Apr; 37(4):495-504. PubMed ID: 24215477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surface ECG and Fluoroscopy are Not Predictive of Right Ventricular Septal Lead Position Compared to Cardiac CT. Rowe MK; Moore P; Pratap J; Coucher J; Gould PA; Kaye GC Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 May; 40(5):537-544. PubMed ID: 28244206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Left and right ventricular lead positions are imprecisely determined by fluoroscopy in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison with cardiac computed tomography. Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Nørgaard BL; Gerdes C; Mortensen PT; Nielsen JC Europace; 2014 Sep; 16(9):1334-41. PubMed ID: 24687965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Localization of pacing and defibrillator leads using standard x-ray views is frequently inaccurate and is not reproducible. Jackson LR; Piccini JP; Daubert JP; Hurwitz Koweek LM; Atwater BD J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 43(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 25715917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates. Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classical fluoroscopy criteria poorly predict right ventricular lead septal positioning by comparison with echocardiography. Squara F; Scarlatti D; Riccini P; Garret G; Moceri P; Ferrari E J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Jul; 52(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 29536314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic impact of lead tip position confirmed via computed tomography in patients with right ventricular septal pacing. Hattori M; Naruse Y; Oginosawa Y; Matsue Y; Hanaki Y; Kowase S; Kurosaki K; Mizukami A; Kohno R; Abe H; Aonuma K; Nogami A Heart Rhythm; 2019 Jun; 16(6):921-927. PubMed ID: 30633981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proximity of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads to coronary arteries as assessed by cardiac computed tomography. Pang BJ; Joshi SB; Lui EH; Tacey MA; Alison J; Seneviratne SK; Cameron JD; Mond HG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jun; 37(6):717-23. PubMed ID: 24372320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of right ventricular lead location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. Haghjoo M; Bonakdar HR; Jorat MV; Fazelifar AF; Alizadeh A; Ojaghi-Haghjghi Z; Esmaielzadeh M; Sadr-Ameli MA Europace; 2009 Mar; 11(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 19136489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individualized Left Anterior Oblique Projection: A Highly Reliable Patient-Tailored Fluoroscopy Criterion for Right Ventricular Lead Positioning. Squara F; Scarlatti D; Riccini P; Garret G; Moceri P; Ferrari E Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 Jul; 11(7):e006107. PubMed ID: 29925536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Similar long-term benefits conferred by apical versus mid-septal implantation of the right ventricular lead in recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy systems. Bulava A; Lukl J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S32-7. PubMed ID: 19250108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Localization of right ventricular non-apical lead position: comparison of three-dimensional echocardiography, computed tomography, and fluoroscopic imaging. Chen YL; Wang HT; Chen HC; Chai HT; Lee YW; Liu WH J Int Med Res; 2021 Mar; 49(3):300060521996159. PubMed ID: 33736536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inadequacy of fluoroscopy and electrocardiogram in predicting septal position in RVOT pacing - Validation with cardiac computed tomography. Sharma G; Salahuddin S; Sanders P; Gupta H; Gulati G; Jagia P; Bahl VK Indian Heart J; 2016; 68(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 27133327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of temporary right ventricular pacing from different sites on echocardiographic indices of cardiac function. Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Broadhurst P Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1738-46. PubMed ID: 21764814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Right ventricular pacemaker lead position is associated with differences in long-term outcomes and complications. Witt CM; Lenz CJ; Shih HH; Ebrille E; Rosenbaum AN; van Zyl M; Aung H; Manocha KK; Deshmukh AJ; Hodge DO; Mulpuru SK; Cha YM; Espinosa RE; Asirvatham SJ; Mcleod CJ J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 28(8):924-930. PubMed ID: 28543771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive focus localization, right ventricular epicardial potential mapping in patients with an MRI-conditional pacemaker system - a pilot study. van der Graaf AW; Bhagirath P; de Hooge J; Ramanna H; van Driel VJ; de Groot NM; Götte MJ J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Dec; 44(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 26369330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized comparison of fluoroscopic techniques for implanting pacemaker lead on the right ventricular outflow tract septum. Chen D; Wei H; Tang J; Liu L; Wu S; Lin C; Zhang Q; Liang Y; Chen S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 32(5):721-8. PubMed ID: 26797500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard. Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]