191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26769673)
41. High Level of Agreement Between Pretherapeutic 124I PET and Intratherapeutic 131I Imaging in Detecting Iodine-Positive Thyroid Cancer Metastases.
Ruhlmann M; Jentzen W; Ruhlmann V; Pettinato C; Rossi G; Binse I; Bockisch A; Rosenbaum-Krumme S
J Nucl Med; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1339-42. PubMed ID: 27151981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Low dose non-enhanced CT versus standard dose contrast-enhanced CT in combined PET/CT protocols for staging and therapy planning in non-small cell lung cancer.
Pfannenberg AC; Aschoff P; Brechtel K; Müller M; Bares R; Paulsen F; Scheiderbauer J; Friedel G; Claussen CD; Eschmann SM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Jan; 34(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16896664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Impact of the introduction of integrated PET-CT into the preoperative staging pathway of patients with potentially operable oesophageal carcinoma.
Salahudeen HM; Balan A; Naik K; Mirsadraee S; Scarsbrook AF
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):765-73. PubMed ID: 18555034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques.
Koolen BB; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Aukema TS; Vogel WV; Oldenburg HS; van der Hage JA; Hoefnagel CA; Stokkel MP; Loo CE; Rodenhuis S; Rutgers EJ; Valdés Olmos RA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 21935602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Detection of unknown primary tumours and distant metastases in patients with cervical metastases: value of FDG-PET versus conventional modalities.
Regelink G; Brouwer J; de Bree R; Pruim J; van der Laan BF; Vaalburg W; Hoekstra OS; Comans EF; Vissink A; Leemans CR; Roodenburg JL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1024-30. PubMed ID: 12173016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography for suspected recurrent papillary thyroid cancer: early experience at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.
Dahele M; Ung YC; Ehrlich L; Silverberg J; Balogh J; Wong CS
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Oct; 37(5):712-7. PubMed ID: 19128681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET.
Antoch G; Saoudi N; Kuehl H; Dahmen G; Mueller SP; Beyer T; Bockisch A; Debatin JF; Freudenberg LS
J Clin Oncol; 2004 Nov; 22(21):4357-68. PubMed ID: 15514377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Leblanc E; Gauthier H; Querleu D; Ferron G; Zerdoud S; Morice P; Uzan C; Lumbroso S; Lecuru F; Bats AS; Ghazzar N; Bannier M; Houvenaeghel G; Brenot-Rossi I; Narducci F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2302-9. PubMed ID: 21347790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the management of anal cancer.
Mistrangelo M; Pelosi E; Bellò M; Ricardi U; Milanesi E; Cassoni P; Baccega M; Filippini C; Racca P; Lesca A; Munoz FH; Fora G; Skanjeti A; Cravero F; Morino M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Sep; 84(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 22592047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Utility of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in the preoperative staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Roh JL; Yeo NK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Oral Oncol; 2007 Oct; 43(9):887-93. PubMed ID: 17207656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. MIB-1 Index-Stratified Assessment of Dual-Tracer PET/CT with
Sampathirao N; Basu S
J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Mar; 45(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 28154019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Melsaether AN; Raad RA; Pujara AC; Ponzo FD; Pysarenko KM; Jhaveri K; Babb JS; Sigmund EE; Kim SG; Moy LA
Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 27023002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Role of FDG-PET in the assessment of survival prognosis in melanoma.
Pleiss C; Risse JH; Biersack HJ; Bender H
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2007 Dec; 22(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 18158764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan?
Caglar M; Kupik O; Karabulut E; Høilund-Carlsen PF
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26514321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Whole Body Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in the Evaluation of Ophthalmic Tumors.
Jiang P; Liao SS; Lan XL; Jiang FG
Curr Med Sci; 2018 Apr; 38(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 30074190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Solitary Orbital Metastasis in Carcinoma Esophagus: Findings on Serial 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans.
Mahajan S; Dunphy MP; Haque S; Pandit-Taskar N
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 29135612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis and staging of primary ocular and orbital tumors.
Hui KH; Pfeiffer ML; Esmaeli B
Saudi J Ophthalmol; 2012 Oct; 26(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 23961021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Diagnostic Challenges of Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Role of Positron Emission Tomography-Computerized Tomography.
Gofrit ON; Orevi M
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):648-57. PubMed ID: 27140072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Primary Orbital Leiomyosarcoma in an Adult Male.
Chaugule SS; Putambekar A; Gavade S; Deshpande R
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019; 35(2):e27-e29. PubMed ID: 30601462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
