These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2677039)

  • 1. New methods for quantitative and qualitative facial studies: an overview.
    Thomas IT; Hintz RJ; Frias JL
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1989; 9(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 2677039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial morphology as determined by anthropometry: keeping it simple.
    Ward RE
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1989; 9(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 2677040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photogrammetric evaluation in clinical genetics: theoretical considerations and experimental results.
    DiLiberti JH; Olson DP
    Am J Med Genet; 1991 May; 39(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 2063918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional cephalometry using individual skeletal laser technology models.
    Z'Graggen M; Schiel HJ; Kunz C; Lambrecht JT
    Clin Anat; 2001 Jul; 14(4):258-68. PubMed ID: 11424200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.
    Lunsford LD; Flickinger JC; Larson D
    Oncologist; 1997; 2(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 10388030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical methodology applied to facial studies.
    Lavelle CL
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1989; 9(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 2677044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Method selection in craniofacial measurements: advantages and disadvantages of 3D digitization method.
    Ozsoy U; Demirel BM; Yildirim FB; Tosun O; Sarikcioglu L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 19179087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric analysis for the surgeon.
    Grayson BH
    Clin Plast Surg; 1989 Oct; 16(4):633-44. PubMed ID: 2805576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Describing a craniofacial anomaly: finite elements and the biometrics of landmark locations.
    Bookstein FL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1987 Dec; 74(4):495-509. PubMed ID: 3442300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Value of anthropometric techniques in pediatric otology].
    Perrin P; Perrin C; Leheup B; Pierson M; Pernot C
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1989; 110(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 2491711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for assessment of craniofacial malformations.
    Pelo S; Tassiello S; Boniello R; Gasparini G; Longobardi G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 17(6):1035-9. PubMed ID: 17119401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Craniofacial anthropometric patterns in genetic facial dysmorphism: methodology and applications].
    Guyot L; Richard O; Philip N; Dutour O
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2002 Apr; 103(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 11997739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Symposium on Quantitative Methods in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Craniofacial Anomalies. Albuquerque, 1986.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1987 Dec; 74(4):439-537. PubMed ID: 3442294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anthropometric guidelines in cranio-orbital surgery.
    Farkas LG; Kolar JC
    Clin Plast Surg; 1987 Jan; 14(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 3816026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infant cephalometrics as a research tool for the comprehensive study of newborns with facial anomalies.
    Berkowitz S
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1968 Feb; 55(2):100-1. PubMed ID: 5746933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Etiopathogenesis of craniofacial anomalies.
    Vander Kolk CA; Beaty T
    Clin Plast Surg; 1994 Oct; 21(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 7813149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: a review of photogrammetry and cephalometry.
    Douglas TS
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Oct; 28(7):401-9. PubMed ID: 15464879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brief communication: measurement size, precision, and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: bigger is better.
    Jamison PL; Ward RE
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1993 Apr; 90(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 8476006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.