153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26772827)
1. [Ten-year fracture risk by FRAX(®) of women with osteoporosis attending osteoporosis care in Hungary].
Péntek M; Gulácsi L; Tóth E; Baji P; Brodszky V; Horváth C
Orv Hetil; 2016 Jan; 157(4):146-53. PubMed ID: 26772827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing self-perceived and estimated fracture risk by FRAX® of women with osteoporosis.
Baji P; Gulácsi L; Horváth C; Brodszky V; Rencz F; Péntek M
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):4. PubMed ID: 28004298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low self-awareness of osteoporosis and fracture risk among postmenopausal women.
Langer FW; da Silveira Codevilla AA; Bringhenti R; Dal Osto LC; Campos TR; Martins TT; Barin AE; Rigo PH; Boufleuer ND; Santinon SF; Kipper K; Rodrigues J; Premaor MO
Arch Osteoporos; 2016 Dec; 11(1):27. PubMed ID: 27503622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.
Siris ES; Baim S; Nattiv A
Postgrad Med; 2010 Jan; 122(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 20107292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds for osteoporosis in Iran.
Khashayar P; Keshtkar A; Ostovar A; Larijani B; Johansson H; Harvey NC; Lorentzon M; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Nov; 30(11):2225-2230. PubMed ID: 31372709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct comparison of eight national FRAX® tools for fracture prediction and treatment qualification in Canadian women.
Leslie WD; Brennan SL; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23929269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The epidemiology of osteoporosis in Italian postmenopausal women according to the National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria: a multicenter cohort study.
Cipriani C; Pepe J; Bertoldo F; Bianchi G; Cantatore FP; Corrado A; Di Stefano M; Frediani B; Gatti D; Giustina A; Porcelli T; Isaia G; Rossini M; Nieddu L; Minisola S; Girasole G; Pedrazzoni M
J Endocrinol Invest; 2018 Apr; 41(4):431-438. PubMed ID: 28956296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ten-year probability of osteoporotic fracture in 2012 Polish women assessed by FRAX and nomogram by Nguyen et al.-Conformity between methods and their clinical utility.
Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Franek E; Leszczynski P; Sewerynek E; Wichrowska H; Napiorkowska L; Kostyk T; Stuss M; Stepien-Klos W; Golba KS; Drozdzowska B
Bone; 2010 Jun; 46(6):1661-7. PubMed ID: 20156606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of FRAX®-based intervention thresholds for management of osteoporosis in Singaporean women.
Chandran M; Ganesan G; Tan KB; Reginster JY; Hiligsmann M
Osteoporos Int; 2021 Jan; 32(1):133-144. PubMed ID: 32797250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds for osteoporosis in Romania.
Grigorie D; Sucaliuc A; Johansson H; Kanis JA; McCloskey E
Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():164. PubMed ID: 24390553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) Results Calculated With and Without Bone Mineral Density Values for the Evaluation of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia.
Imerci A; Yalın Kılınç C; Aydogan NH; Karalezli MN; Savran A
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):464-471. PubMed ID: 28781230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification of functioning and assessment of fracture risk of a large Italian osteoporotic population. The Physiatric Approach To Osteoporosis project.
Gimigliano F; Moretti A; Riccio I; Letizia Mauro G; Gimigliano R; Iolascon G
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Oct; 51(5):529-38. PubMed ID: 25994371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. clinical risk factors for osteoporosis in Ireland and the UK: a comparison of FRAX and QFractureScores.
Cummins NM; Poku EK; Towler MR; O'Driscoll OM; Ralston SH
Calcif Tissue Int; 2011 Aug; 89(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 21647704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of a two-step population-based osteoporosis screening program using FRAX: the randomized Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation (ROSE) study.
Rubin KH; Rothmann MJ; Holmberg T; Høiberg M; Möller S; Barkmann R; Glüer CC; Hermann AP; Bech M; Gram J; Brixen K
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Mar; 29(3):567-578. PubMed ID: 29218381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revised FRAX®-based intervention thresholds for the management of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women in Sri Lanka.
Lekamwasam S; Chandran M; Subasinghe S
Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Mar; 14(1):33. PubMed ID: 30850909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sri Lankan FRAX model and country-specific intervention thresholds.
Lekamwasam S
Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():148. PubMed ID: 23975235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A discussion of the intervention thresholds in osteoporosis treatment in Poland.
Marcinkowska M; Ignaszak-Szczepaniak M; Wawrzyniak A; Dytfeld J; Marcinkowska WH; Ignaszak-Szczepaniak M; Wawrzyniak A; Dytfeld J; Horst-Sikorska W
Endokrynol Pol; 2011; 62(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 21365576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene incorporating the FRAX® algorithm in a European perspective.
Borgström F; Ström O; Kleman M; McCloskey E; Johansson H; Odén A; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):955-65. PubMed ID: 20532482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The application of FRAX® to determine intervention thresholds in osteoporosis treatment in Poland.
Badurski JE; Kanis JA; Johansson H; Dobreńko A; Nowak NA; Daniluk S; Jezienicka E
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2011 May; 121(5):148-55. PubMed ID: 21610662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of osteoporotic fractures in the group of woman over 50 years of age--comparison of tools FRAX BMD versus FRAX BMI].
Strugala C; Sobala W; Szubert Z; Hanke W
Med Pr; 2013; 64(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24261246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
